Literature DB >> 7645666

The effects of Dynavision rehabilitation on behind-the-wheel driving ability and selected psychomotor abilities of persons after stroke.

P Klavora1, P Gaskovski, K Martin, R D Forsyth, R J Heslegrave, M Young, R P Quinn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Many conventional rehabilitation exercises, such as pencil-and-paper and computer tasks, may not train perceptual and motor skills as applied to a complex, multiskill activity such as driving. The present study examined the usefulness of the Dynavision apparatus for driving-related rehabilitation. The Dynavision was designed to train visual scanning, peripheral visual awareness, visual attention, and visual-motor reaction time across a broad, active visual field.
METHOD: Ten persons with a cerebrovascular accident participated in the study. All had failed behind-the-wheel driving assessments. Subjects participated in a 6-week Dynavision training program using exercises designed to impose various motor, perceptual, and cognitive demands.
RESULTS: Dynavision training resulted in significantly improved behind-the-wheel driving assessments as compared to expected outcomes. Comparisons between pretests, posttests, and follow-up tests on a number of Dynavision, response, and reaction time variables showed significant improvements and maintenance effects. Dynavision performance, and, to a lesser extent, choice visual reaction and response times, were found to differentiate between persons assessed as safe and unsafe to drive, and between older and younger drivers. Subject self-reports suggested that a variety of training-related improvements had occurred in everyday functioning.
CONCLUSION: Dynavision training shows some rehabilitative promise for improving driving and basic psychomotor skills. Future research on the benefits and limitations of this apparatus should use finer laboratory skill measures and more comprehensive tests of driving and daily functioning to assess more thoroughly skill improvements in persons after stroke.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7645666     DOI: 10.5014/ajot.49.6.534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Occup Ther        ISSN: 0272-9490


  7 in total

Review 1.  Driving with homonymous visual field loss: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Alex R Bowers
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.742

2.  Dynavision Normative Data for Healthy Adults: Reaction Test Program.

Authors:  Cherie Blackwell; Kathy Cary; Kami Holst; Kristen Mandle; Lori Dryg; Susan Clemens; Jon H Lemke; Sarah Castro; Emma Hendricks; Ryan Kelly
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2020 Jan/Feb

Review 3.  Rehabilitation for improving automobile driving after stroke.

Authors:  Stacey George; Maria Crotty; Isabelle Gelinas; Hannes Devos
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-02-25

4.  The effect of static scanning and mobility training on mobility in people with hemianopia after stroke: a randomized controlled trial comparing standardized versus non-standardized treatment protocols.

Authors:  Stacey George; Allison Hayes; Celia Chen; Maria Crotty
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 2.474

5.  Reliability of the Dynavision task in virtual reality to explore visuomotor phenotypes.

Authors:  Yvan Pratviel; Veronique Deschodt-Arsac; Florian Larrue; Laurent M Arsac
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  A Systematic Review of Commercial Cognitive Training Devices: Implications for Use in Sport.

Authors:  David J Harris; Mark R Wilson; Samuel J Vine
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-11

7.  Response Time to a Vibrotactile Stimulus Presented on the Foot at Rest and During Walking on Different Surfaces.

Authors:  Landry Delphin Chapwouo Tchakouté; Louis Tremblay; Bob-Antoine J Menelas
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.576

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.