Literature DB >> 7645480

Assessment of articular cartilage thickness of the humeral head: MR-anatomic correlation in cadavers.

J Hodler1, R A Loredo, C Longo, D Trudell, J S Yu, D Resnick.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate several commonly used MR sequences to determine how accurately each demonstrates the thickness of the articular cartilage of the humeral head.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten cadaveric shoulders (age at death, 58-92 years; mean, 79 years) were imaged with fat-suppressed transaxial T1-weighted spin-echo three-dimensional gradient-recalled sequences, both before and after injection of 12 ml of diluted gadopentetate dimeglumine. Articular cartilage was measured to the nearest 10th of a millimeter on the MR images and corresponding anatomic sections.
RESULTS: Cartilage could not be differentiated from surrounding structures in 14 of 112 locations (13%) on the spin-echo images obtained without contrast material, in 4 of 112 locations (4%) on the spin-echo images obtained with contrast material, in 4 of 112 locations (4%) on the gradient-echo images obtained without contrast material, and in 6 of 112 locations (5%) on the gradient-echo images obtained with contrast material. Mean true cartilage thickness was 1.23 mm (SD, 0.52 mm). The mean MR-anatomic differences (absolute values) were 0.38 mm for the spin-echo images obtained without contrast material, 0.42 mm for the spin-echo images obtained with contrast material, 0.49 mm for the gradient-echo images obtained without contrast material, and 0.37 mm for the gradient-echo images obtained with contrast material. There was a tendency to overestimate thin cartilage and to underestimate thick cartilage.
CONCLUSION: Several of the routinely used MR sequences, with and without intraarticular contrast medium, may cause errors in the assessment of the articular cartilage of the humeral head. Some of these errors result from either insufficient contrast between cartilage and surrounding structures or inadequately concentrated contrast medium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7645480     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.165.3.7645480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  11 in total

1.  SONOGRAPHY : A VALUABLE MODALITY IN EVALUATION OF CHRONIC NON-TRAUMATIC DISORDERS OF THE SHOULDER JOINT.

Authors:  P K Gupta; S S Uppal; K Achuthan; C M Adya; Amarjit Singh; J S Saini
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2017-06-26

2.  Thickness distribution of the glenohumeral joint cartilage: a quantitative study using computed tomography.

Authors:  Valentin Zumstein; Marko Kraljević; Annemarie Conzen; Sebastian Hoechel; Magdalena Müller-Gerbl
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Management of cartilage defects in the shoulder.

Authors:  Anthony A Depalma; Konrad I Gruson
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2012-09

4.  Cartilage lesions of the glenohumeral joint: diagnostic effectiveness of multidetector spiral CT arthrography and comparison with arthroscopy.

Authors:  Frédéric E Lecouvet; Benjamin Dorzée; Jean E Dubuc; Bruno C Vande Berg; Jacques Jamart; Jacques Malghem
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Diagnostic performance of CT-arthrography and 1.5T MR-arthrography for the assessment of glenohumeral joint cartilage: a comparative study with arthroscopic correlation.

Authors:  Patrick Omoumi; Alexandra Rubini; Jean-Emile Dubuc; Bruno C Vande Berg; Frédéric E Lecouvet
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  In Vivo Measurement of Glenohumeral Joint Contact Patterns.

Authors:  Michael J Bey; Stephanie K Kline; Roger Zauel; Patricia A Kolowich; Terrence R Lock
Journal:  EURASIP J Adv Signal Process       Date:  2010-01-01

7.  Combination of microfracture and periostal-flap for the treatment of focal full thickness articular cartilage lesions of the shoulder: a prospective study.

Authors:  R Siebold; S Lichtenberg; P Habermeyer
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-04-29       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Articular cartilage and labral lesions of the glenohumeral joint: diagnostic performance of 3D water-excitation true FISP MR arthrography.

Authors:  Tobias Johannes Dietrich; Marco Zanetti; Nadja Saupe; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Sandro F Fucentese; Juerg Hodler
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Standard reference values for musculoskeletal ultrasonography.

Authors:  W A Schmidt; H Schmidt; B Schicke; E Gromnica-Ihle
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  Quantitative assessment of morphology, T, and T2 of shoulder cartilage using MRI.

Authors:  Lorenzo Nardo; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Solomon Tang; Andrew Lai; Roland Krug
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.