Literature DB >> 7645277

Contrast sensitivity and coherent motion detection measured at photopic luminance levels in dyslexics and controls.

P Cornelissen, A Richardson, A Mason, S Fowler, J Stein.   

Abstract

Development dyslexics perform differently from controls on a number of low level visual tasks. We carried out three experiments to explore some of these differences. Dyslexics have been found to have reduced luminance contrast sensitivity at mesopic luminance levels. We failed to replicate this finding at photopic luminance levels. We also compared the (photopic) coherent motion detection thresholds of groups of child and adult dyslexics with those of age matched controls. Dyslexics were significantly less sensitive to motion. The results are discussed in relation to a recent suggestion that developmental dyslexia may be associated with a magnocellular visual deficit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7645277     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)98728-r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  56 in total

Review 1.  Unravelling the development of the visual cortex: implications for plasticity and repair.

Authors:  James A Bourne
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Global motion perception is independent from contrast sensitivity for coherent motion direction discrimination and visual acuity in 4.5-year-old children.

Authors:  Arijit Chakraborty; Nicola S Anstice; Robert J Jacobs; Nabin Paudel; Linda L LaGasse; Barry M Lester; Trecia A Wouldes; Jane E Harding; Benjamin Thompson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 3.  Demonstrations of decreased sensitivity to complex motion information not enough to propose an autism-specific neural etiology.

Authors:  Armando Bertone; Jocelyn Faubert
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2006-01

4.  Contrast responsivity in MT+ correlates with phonological awareness and reading measures in children.

Authors:  Michal Ben-Shachar; Robert F Dougherty; Gayle K Deutsch; Brian A Wandell
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  Reverse hierarchies and sensory learning.

Authors:  Merav Ahissar; Mor Nahum; Israel Nelken; Shaul Hochstein
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Do different 'magnocellular tasks' probe the same neural substrate?

Authors:  Patrick T Goodbourn; Jenny M Bosten; Ruth E Hogg; Gary Bargary; Adam J Lawrance-Owen; J D Mollon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Dyslexia and a temporal processing deficit: A reply to the commentaries.

Authors:  R M Klein; M E Farmer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-12

Review 8.  Perception and apperception in autism: rejecting the inverse assumption.

Authors:  Kate Plaisted Grant; Greg Davis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Agency alters perceptual decisions about action-outcomes.

Authors:  Andrea Desantis; Florian Waszak; Andrei Gorea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of early visual pathways in dyslexia.

Authors:  J B Demb; G M Boynton; D J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.