Literature DB >> 7644447

Sigmoidoscopy use among primary care physicians.

R E Schoen1, J L Weissfeld, L H Kuller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite endorsement by a variety of professional societies, screening sigmoidoscopy is performed on a small minority of patients. We performed a survey of primary care physicians in Allegheny County to examine in detail their current practice and attitude toward screening sigmoidoscopy.
METHODS: Physicians were surveyed by mail or telephone. Eligible respondents were required to practice in the county and perform direct patients care.
RESULTS: Of 732 adult primary care physicians in Allegheny County, 400 were randomly selected for sampling and 279, or 70%, responded. Over 88% of physicians agreed completely or partly with current American Cancer Society recommendations for screening sigmoidoscopy, but only 34% (95% CI 29-39%) reported they regularly refer or schedule patients for screening. Physicians who screen were more likely to be from internal medicine or family practice (P < 0.001) and to be trained in (P < 0.001) or to personally perform (P < 0.001) sigmoidoscopy. The greater the number of barriers to screening cited by physicians, including cost, patient discomfort, equipment availability, low probability of finding a lesion, time it takes to do sigmoidoscopy, and the risk of the procedure, the lower the screening rate (P = 0.002).
CONCLUSION: (a) Although primary care physicians in Allegheny County report that they support screening sigmoidoscopy, only one-third regularly refer or schedule patients, (b) physicians who are trained in or who perform sigmoidoscopy are more likely to screen patients, and (c) further education and training of primary care physicians in sigmoidoscopy will be required to increase screening rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7644447     DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1995.1041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  3 in total

1.  Efficacy of tele-endoscopy in a rural capitated market.

Authors:  P L Moses; J J McGowan; M A Ricci
Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp       Date:  1997

2.  Attitudes toward colorectal cancer screening tests.

Authors:  B S Ling; M A Moskowitz; D Wachs; B Pearson; P C Schroy
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Collaborative colorectal cancer screening: a successful quality improvement initiative.

Authors:  Joyce Stroud; Chris Felton; Barbara Spreadbury
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2003-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.