Literature DB >> 7644323

The perception of surface orientation from multiple sources of optical information.

J F Norman1, J T Todd, F Phillips.   

Abstract

An orientation matching task was used to evaluate observers' sensitivity to local surface orientation at designated probe points on randomly shaped 3-D objects that were optically defined by texture, lambertian shading, or specular highlights. These surfaces could be stationary or in motion, and they could be viewed either monocularly or stereoscopically, in all possible combinations. It was found that the deformations of shading and/or highlights (either over time or between the two eyes' views) produced levels of performance similar to those obtained for the optical deformations of textured surfaces. These findings suggest that the human visual system utilizes a much richer array of optical information to support its perception of shape than is typically appreciated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7644323     DOI: 10.3758/bf03213268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  19 in total

1.  Surface perception in pictures.

Authors:  J J Koenderink; A J van Doorn; A M Kappers
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-11

2.  Shape from specularities: computation and psychophysics.

Authors:  A Blake; H Bülthoff
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1991-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The visual discrimination of relative surface orientation.

Authors:  J T Todd; J F Norman
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Effects of changing viewing conditions on the perceived structure of smoothly curved surfaces.

Authors:  J T Todd; J J Koenderink; A J van Doorn; A M Kappers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Perception of structure from motion: is projective correspondence of moving elements a necessary condition?

Authors:  J T Todd
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Integration of depth modules: stereo and shading.

Authors:  H H Bülthoff; H A Mallot
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Perception of solid shape from shading.

Authors:  E Mingolla; J T Todd
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.086

8.  Systematic distortion of perceived three-dimensional structure from motion and binocular stereopsis.

Authors:  J S Tittle; J T Todd; V J Perotti; J F Norman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Perception of local shape from shading.

Authors:  R G Erens; A M Kappers; J J Koenderink
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-08

10.  Perception of rigid motion in depth from the optical deformations of shadows and occlusion boundaries.

Authors:  J F Norman; J T Todd
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  18 in total

1.  Large perspective changes yield perception of metric shape that allows accurate feedforward reaches-to-grasp and it persists after the optic flow has stopped!

Authors:  Young-Lim Lee; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The underestimation of egocentric distance: evidence from frontal matching tasks.

Authors:  Zhi Li; John Phillips; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Perceived 3D metric (or Euclidean) shape is merely ambiguous, not systematically distorted.

Authors:  Young Lim Lee; Mats Lind; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Specular reflections and the estimation of shape from binocular disparity.

Authors:  Alexander A Muryy; Andrew E Welchman; Andrew Blake; Roland W Fleming
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Solid shape discrimination from vision and haptics: natural objects (Capsicum annuum) and Gibson's "feelies".

Authors:  J Farley Norman; Flip Phillips; Jessica S Holmin; Hideko F Norman; Amanda M Beers; Alexandria M Boswell; Jacob R Cheeseman; Angela G Stethen; Cecilia Ronning
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Visual discrimination of local surface depth and orientation.

Authors:  F D Reichel; J T Todd; E Yilmaz
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-11

7.  The perception of 3-D structure from contradictory optical patterns.

Authors:  J F Norman; J T Todd
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-08

8.  Manual matching of perceived surface orientation is affected by arm posture: evidence of calibration between proprioception and visual experience in near space.

Authors:  Zhi Li; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Learned Non-Rigid Object Motion is a View-Invariant Cue to Recognizing Novel Objects.

Authors:  Lewis L Chuang; Quoc C Vuong; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  The extraction of depth structure from shading and texture in the macaque brain.

Authors:  Koen Nelissen; Olivier Joly; Jean-Baptiste Durand; James T Todd; Wim Vanduffel; Guy A Orban
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.