Literature DB >> 7644321

Influence of flicker on perceived size and depth.

R J Miller1, R Patterson.   

Abstract

Previous research (e.g., Wong & Weisstein, 1984a, 1985) has shown that flickering stimuli appear to be more distant than nonflickering stimuli at the same physical distance. Given this relation between flicker and perceived depth, inappropriate constancy scaling theories predict that flickering stimuli should be perceived as larger than nonflickering ones. In contrast, links between flicker and motion perception suggest that flickering stimuli should be perceived as smaller than nonflickering ones. Two experiments tested these contrasting predictions. In Experiment 1, 22 subjects compared flickering and nonflickering vertical lines and reported that the flickering stimulus appeared significantly smaller than the nonflickering one. In Experiment 2, 21 subjects reported that the stimuli used in Experiment 1 produced depth effects similar to those reported in previous experiments: flickering stimuli were perceived as more distant than nonflickering ones. The observed effect of flicker on perceived size was contrary to predictions from inappropriate constancy scaling theory, but consistent with views that motion and flicker are processed by the same pathway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7644321     DOI: 10.3758/bf03213266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  30 in total

1.  Spatial attention in Ponzo-like patterns.

Authors:  A W Pressey; D Epp
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-08

2.  The effects of atmospheric scattering on binocular depth perception.

Authors:  G A FRY; C S BRIDGMAN; V J ELLERBROCK
Journal:  Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom       Date:  1949-01

3.  Illusion reversal rate as a function of subjective depth.

Authors:  C R Borresen
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  1990-01

4.  A method to assess the relative contribution of lateral inhibition to the magnitude of visual-geometric illusions.

Authors:  S Coren; C Porac; D J Aks; K Morikawa
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-06

5.  An experimental and theorectical appraisal of the inappropriate size-depth theories of illusions.

Authors:  G H Fisher
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1968-11

6.  Static visual noise and the Ansbacher Effect.

Authors:  G Stanley
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1970-02       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Subjective Lorentz transformations and the perception of motion.

Authors:  T Caelli; W Hoffman; H Lindman
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1978-03

8.  Perceived rate of movement depends on contrast.

Authors:  P Thompson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  A new visual illusion: flickering fields are localized in a depth plane behind nonflickering fields.

Authors:  E Wong; N Weisstein
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Comments on the inappropriate constancy scaling theory of the illusions and its implications.

Authors:  R L Gregory
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1967-08       Impact factor: 2.143

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.