Literature DB >> 7643791

Instrumentation and dosimeter-size artifacts in quantitative thermoluminescence dosimetry of low-dose fields.

A S Meigooni1, V Mishra, H Panth, J Williamson.   

Abstract

Thermoluminescence dosimetry is extensively used for quantitative dose measurements in various irradiation fields such as dosimetry of brachytherapy sources. In this application, small doses on the order of 0.5 cGy must be accurately measured, which requires careful control of instrumentation, energy-dependence, and nonlinearity of detector response. Several investigators have observed the presence of some undesirable signals when the thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were read without any nitrogen gas flow in the TLD reader. Others have indicated that the "prereadout" annealing technique is the same as the "preirradiation" technique for doses above 10 cGy, but they have not extended their study to lower doses. The goal of this study is to investigate dependence of sensitivity and linearity of the TLD response to the flow of nitrogen gas in the TLD reader at low dose level, annealing technique, and TLD size. The effect of nitrogen flow sensitivity and linearity of two different sizes of lithium fluoride TLD-100 chips has been studied. Our data indicate a large standard deviation of TLD sensitivity, up to a factor of 2, when TLDs were read without nitrogen gas flow in the TLD reader. In addition, a large deviation from linearity was observed for doses below 5 cGy. When the reading-chamber was purged with nitrogen gas, dispersion of the responses of the TLDs that were exposed to the same dose fell to within 5%. At precision levels of 2% and 5%, the low dose limits are 1 cGy and 0.5 cGy, respectively, for large chips and 15 cGy and 1 cGy for small chips, if TLDs are read with nitrogen gas flow in the TLD reader.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7643791     DOI: 10.1118/1.597555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  7 in total

1.  Verification of IMRT dose calculations using AAA and PBC algorithms in dose buildup regions.

Authors:  Arun S Oinam; Lakhwant Singh
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 2.102

2.  A protocol to extend the longitudinal coverage of on-board cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Dandan Zheng; Jun Lu; Ariel Jefferson; Cheng Zhang; Jian Wu; William Sleeman; Elisabeth Weiss; Nesrin Dogan; Shiyu Song; Jeffrey Williamson
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Dosimetric evaluation of a newly designed low dose rate brachytherapy applicator for treatment of cervical cancer with extension into the lower vagina.

Authors:  Curtis Baker; Sharifeh A Dini; Mahesh Kudrimoti; Shahid B Awan; Ali S Meigooni
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Dosimetry of gamma chamber blood irradiator using PAGAT gel dosimeter and Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Parvin Mohammadyari; Mehdi Zehtabian; Sedigheh Sina; Ali Reza Tavasoli; Reza Faghihi
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Measured transverse-axis dosimetric parameters of the model STM1251 125I interstitial source.

Authors:  Z Li; J F Williamson
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Impact of the vaginal applicator and dummy pellets on the dosimetry parameters of Cs-137 brachytherapy source.

Authors:  Sedigheh Sina; Reza Faghihi; Ali S Meigooni; Simin Mehdizadeh; M Amin Mosleh Shirazi; Mehdi Zehtabian
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 2.243

7.  Monte Carlo calculations and experimental measurements of the TG-43U1-recommended dosimetric parameters of 125I (Model IR-Seed2) brachytherapy source.

Authors:  Sahar Sheikholeslami; Hasan Ali Nedaie; Mahdi Sadeghi; Hosein Pourbeigy; Sohrab Shahzadi; Mehdi Zehtabian; Mohsen Hasani; Ali S Meigooni
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.