Literature DB >> 7643203

Tactile resolution: peripheral neural mechanisms underlying the human capacity to determine positions of objects contacting the fingerpad.

H E Wheat1, A W Goodwin, A S Browning.   

Abstract

We measured the ability of humans to discriminate the positions of spherical objects passively contacting the fingerpad. The discrimination threshold averaged 0.55 mm for a moderately curved sphere (radius 5.80 mm) and decreased to 0.38 mm for a more curved sphere (radius 1.92 mm); since the receptor density is about 1 per mm2, these values are substantially smaller than those predicted by the sampling theorem (referred to as hyperacuity). To elucidate the underlying neural mechanisms, responses to the same spheres and random sequences of stimuli were recorded from single Merkel afferents (SAIs) and Meissner afferents (RAs) in anesthetized monkeys. For multiple applications of identical stimuli, coefficients of variation of responses were around 3%. Profiles of responses across the SAI population were "hill-shaped." A change in position of the stimulus on the skin resulted in a matching shift of the profile, evident over the whole profile for the more curved sphere but ony at the skirts for the less curved sphere. The shift in response profiles, relative to the standard deviations, increased as the change in position increased, and was more reliable for the more curved sphere. Responses were measured over four time frames: 0.2, 0.3, 0.5, and 1.0 sec. Although responses increased with an increase in integration time, so, too, did their standard deviations, so that signal-to-noise ratios or the resolution in the SAI population was bout the same at 0.2 sec as at 1.0 sec. Only half the RAs responded; responses were small, but signalled reliable information about the position of the stimulus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7643203      PMCID: PMC6577620     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  22 in total

1.  Neuronal population codes and the perception of object distance in weakly electric fish.

Authors:  J E Lewis; L Maler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Encoding of direction of fingertip forces by human tactile afferents.

Authors:  I Birznieks; P Jenmalm; A W Goodwin; R S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Human touch receptors are sensitive to spatial details on the scale of single fingerprint ridges.

Authors:  Ewa Jarocka; J Andrew Pruszynski; Roland S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Curvature discrimination in various finger conditions.

Authors:  Bernard J van der Horst; Astrid M L Kappers
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Manipulating the edge of instability.

Authors:  Madhusudhan Venkadesan; John Guckenheimer; Francisco J Valero-Cuevas
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Restoring the sense of touch with a prosthetic hand through a brain interface.

Authors:  Gregg A Tabot; John F Dammann; Joshua A Berg; Francesco V Tenore; Jessica L Boback; R Jacob Vogelstein; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Rapid geometric feature signaling in the simulated spiking activity of a complete population of tactile nerve fibers.

Authors:  Benoit P Delhaye; Xinyue Xia; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  A touching tale: point sensor or pattern detector?

Authors:  David T Blake
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Time, touch and temperature affect perceived finger position and ownership in the grasp illusion.

Authors:  Martin E Héroux; Nicolas Bayle; Annie A Butler; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Modulation of ongoing EMG by different classes of low-threshold mechanoreceptors in the human hand.

Authors:  P A McNulty; V G Macefield
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.