Literature DB >> 7642910

A technique to quantitate motor recovery following nerve grafting.

T E Trumble1, U Kahn, E Vanderhooft, A W Bach.   

Abstract

Sixteen patients were evaluated retrospectively following grafting of an upper extremity peripheral nerve injury. In addition to the standard subjective muscle grading, the force of reinnervated muscle groups was quantitatively measured using force transducers, and reported relative to the contralateral side. Patients recovered a median motor grade of M3, which correlated to a 32% recovery of muscle force of the contralateral side. M3 and M4 motor grades encompassed a large range of actual muscle force: M3 correlated with a recovered force that ranged from 17% to 42%, M4 with a range of 66% to 79%. The percent force of motor recovery decreased significantly with longer delays to nerve grafting, even when controlling for the severity of the injury. Similarly, recovery of muscle force decreased when longer segments of nerve grafts were used. Testing the return of muscle strength after peripheral nerve injuries with a standardized objective system that compares function to the uninjured side enhances the sensitivity of evaluating nerve regeneration and provides a measurement system that can facilitate the comparison of different nerve repair techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7642910     DOI: 10.1016/S0363-5023(05)80089-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  5 in total

1.  [Diagnostic ability of power measurement of different grip forms for distal median nerve lesion].

Authors:  N Wachter; M Mentzel; G Krischak; C Häderer; J Gülke
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Comparison of ulnar nerve repair according to injury level and type.

Authors:  Hakan Basar; Betül Basar; Bülent Erol; Cihangir Tetik
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Outcome following nerve repair of high isolated clean sharp injuries of the ulnar nerve.

Authors:  René Post; Kornelis S de Boer; Martijn J A Malessy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Factors predicting sensory and motor recovery after the repair of upper limb peripheral nerve injuries.

Authors:  Bo He; Zhaowei Zhu; Qingtang Zhu; Xiang Zhou; Canbin Zheng; Pengliang Li; Shuang Zhu; Xiaolin Liu; Jiakai Zhu
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 5.135

Review 5.  Evidence-Based Approach to Timing of Nerve Surgery: A Review.

Authors:  Brendan J MacKay; Cameron T Cox; Ian L Valerio; Jeffrey A Greenberg; Gregory M Buncke; Peter J Evans; Deana M Mercer; Desirae M McKee; Ivica Ducic
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 1.539

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.