Literature DB >> 7642873

Postoperative lead-related complications in patients with nonthoracotomy defibrillation lead systems.

D Schwartzman1, N Nallamothu, D J Callans, M W Preminger, C D Gottlieb, F E Marchlinski.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to document postoperative complications attributable to nonthoracotomy defibrillation lead systems in a large cohort.
BACKGROUND: The incidence of postoperative complications specifically associated with nonthoracotomy defibrillation lead systems is unknown.
METHODS: Postoperative lead-related complications were evaluated in 170 patients with a nonthoracotomy defibrillation lead system who were followed up for a mean (+/- SD) of 17 +/- 12 months. Each system incorporated one or more intravascular leads. In 117 patients (69%), the system incorporated a subcutaneous defibrillation patch. All implantations were performed in an operating room by cardiothoracic surgeons. Defibrillation thresholds were measured at implantation, before hospital discharge (mean 3 +/- 2 days) and at 4 to 18 weeks after implantation. Patients were evaluated every 2 to 3 months after implantation or as indicated by clinical exigency.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (15.9%) were diagnosed with a lead-related complication that either extended the initial hospital period or led to a second hospital admission. Complications included endocardial lead or subcutaneous defibrillation patch dislodgment in eight patients (4.7%), which was diagnosed between 2 and 345 days after implantation; endocardial or subcutaneous patch lead fracture in six (3.5%), which was diagnosed between 53 and 600 days after implantation; subcutaneous patch mesh fracture in one, which was diagnosed at 150 days after implantation; subclavian vein thrombosis in three (1.8%), which was diagnosed at 2 to 50 days after implantation; and unacceptably elevated defibrillation threshold (within 5 J of maximal device output) in nine (5.3%), which was documented at one of the two postimplantation evaluations in eight patients or at the time of failure to terminate a spontaneous ventricular tachycardia in one. Seventeen of the 27 patients required reoperation for correction of their complication. In addition, system infection requiring complete explantation occurred in seven other patients (4.1%) at an interval from implantation ranging from 14 to 120 days.
CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative complications related to a nonthoracotomy defibrillation lead system were common and frequently required reoperation for correction. The rate of system explantation due to infection was also significant. Postoperative defibrillation testing and vigilant outpatient follow-up evaluation are necessary to ensure normal lead function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7642873     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00244-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  8 in total

1.  Short and medium time experience with a tined, multilumen steroid eluting defibrillation lead.

Authors:  Halfdan Aass; Joseph Ilvento
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Outcome of cardioverter-defibrillator implant in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Giuseppe Boriani; Paolo Artale; Mauro Biffi; Cristian Martignani; Lorenzo Frabetti; Cinzia Valzania; Igor Diemberger; Matteo Ziacchi; Matteo Bertini; Claudio Rapezzi; Mario Parlapiano; Angelo Branzi
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Remote monitoring in implantable defibrillator therapy.

Authors:  D A M J Theuns; L S Jordaens
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 4.  [ICD lead defects: diagnosis and therapeutical options].

Authors:  Christian G Wollmann; Dirk Böcker; Andreas Löher; Hans H Scheld; Günter Breithardt; Rainer Gradaus
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2009-02-11

5.  Delayed perforation of the right ventricular wall by a single standard-caliber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead detected by multidetector computed tomography.

Authors:  An Yoshimori; Atsushi Kobori; Nasu Michihiro; Yutaka Furukawa
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.243

6.  Endovascular extraction techniques: Part 3: Results and indications in patients with an ICD.

Authors:  F A Bracke; A Meijer; B van Gelder
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.380

7.  "Home monitoring" for early detection of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator failure: a single-center prospective observational study.

Authors:  Melanie Hauck; Alexander Bauer; Frederik Voss; Slawomir Weretka; Hugo A Katus; Ruediger Becker
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 5.460

8.  Complications and mortality of single versus dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

Authors:  Ataallah Bagherzadeh; Zahra Emkanjoo; Majid Haghjoo; Maryam Moshkani Farahani; Abolfath Alizadeh; Mohammad Ali Sadr-Ameli
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2006-04-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.