Literature DB >> 7642866

Intravascular ultrasound after low and high inflation pressure coronary artery stent implantation.

G Görge1, M Haude, J Ge, E Voegele, T Gerber, H J Rupprecht, J Meyer, R Erbel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to characterize the differences seen after low or high pressure coronary artery stent deployment as assessed by intravascular ultrasound.
BACKGROUND: Until 1992, the success of stent deployment was assessed by angiographic criteria only, but in 1993 the procedure was expanded to include postprocedural single-use intravascular ultrasound imaging. Ultrasound criteria for successful stent deployment were 1) symmetry, 2) minimal lumen diameter > 3.0 mm, 3) no echo-free spaces between the stent and the vessel, and 4) no uncovered dissections.
METHODS: We used mechanical 4.8F or 3.5F 20- or 30-MHz monorail single-use intravascular ultrasound catheters.
RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were included, 28 treated in 1991 and 1992 (group A) and 24 treated in 1993 or 1994 (group B); 87% of patients underwent elective stent implantation. The number of echocardiographic studies per patient increased from 1 +/- 0.1 (mean +/- SD) in group A to 2.0 +/- 0.85 in group B. Mean maximal balloon size increased from 3.3 +/- 0.33 to 3.73 +/- 0.24 mm and maximal inflation pressure from 6.9 +/- 1.1 to 15.8 +/- 2.4 bar (p < 0.001). The eccentricity index was 0.915 +/- 0.04 in group B versus 0.87 +/- 0.05 in group A. Minimal lumen diameter measured by echocardiography increased from 2.55 +/- 0.41 mm in group A to 3.14 +/- 0.37 mm in group B. The final mean values per cross-sectional area as a percent of calculated balloon area were similar in group A (67.5 +/- 23%) and group B (66.5 +/- 22.9%). No major acute complications occurred in either group; subacute thrombosis developed in two patients, both in group A.
CONCLUSIONS: Intravascular ultrasound data confirm that high pressure stent deployment leads to increased minimal lumen area. Despite high pressure stent deployment, homogeneous stent geometry and optimal stent expansion were not observed in all patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7642866     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00211-l

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  6 in total

1.  [Progress in diagnostics is the driving force for developing interventional methods].

Authors:  R Erbel
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.443

2.  Additional luminal area gain by intravascular ultrasound guidance after coronary stent implantation with high inflation pressure.

Authors:  G S Werner; J Diedrich; S Schünemann; O Gastmann; M Ferrari; A B Buchwald; H R Figulla; H Kreuzer
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1997-08

3.  Randomised comparison of coronary stenting with and without balloon predilatation in selected patients.

Authors:  H Le Breton; J Boschat; P Commeau; P Brunel; M Gilard; C Breut; O Bar; P Geslin; A Tirouvanziam; L Maillard; B Moquet; P Barragan; P Dupouy; G Grollier; J Berland; P Druelles; R Rihani; B Huret; C Leclercq; M Bedossa
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 4.  Coronary microembolization--its role in acute coronary syndromes and interventions.

Authors:  R Erbel; G Heusch
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 5.  Optimization of stent deployment by intravascular ultrasound.

Authors:  Hyuck-Jun Yoon; Seung-Ho Hur
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 2.884

6.  Stent underexpansion in angiographic guided percutaneous coronary intervention, despite adjunctive balloon post-dilatation, in drug eluting stent era.

Authors:  Mehrdad Taherioun; Mohammad Hassan Namazi; Morteza Safi; Habibolah Saadat; Hossein Vakili; Saeed Alipour-Parsa; Hasan Rajabi-Moghadam; Shamsedin Pedari
Journal:  ARYA Atheroscler       Date:  2014-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.