Literature DB >> 7642444

Morphological and functional preservation of the outer hair cells from noise trauma by sound conditioning.

B Canlon1, A Fransson.   

Abstract

Guinea pigs were sound conditioned to a low-level, long-term pure tone stimulus (1 kHz, 81 dB SPL, 24 days) before exposure to a traumatic noise (1 kHz, 105 dB SPL, 72 h). Auditory brainstem response thresholds and distortion product otoacoustic emissions were obtained at selected frequencies before sound conditioning and at day 1, 5, 10, and 15 during sound conditioning as well as on the final 24th day. Auditory brainstem responses at 1 and 2 kHz were not affected at any time during sound conditioning. The amplitude of the distortion product otoacoustic emission showed minor alterations (below 10 dB) at selected frequencies only during the initial stages (day 1, 5, and 10) of sound conditioning in some, but not all the animals. Distortion product amplitudes were similar to control values on the 15th and 24th day of conditioning. Surface preparations of the organ of Corti did not reveal any significant hair cell loss induced by sound conditioning. The effect of a traumatic exposure (1 kHz, 105 dB SPL, 72 h) on a control group and a sound conditioned group was determined. The distortion product otoacoustic emission amplitude measured 4 weeks after the cessation of the traumatic exposure revealed significant differences. The amplitude of the distortion product otoacoustic emission for the control group was depressed at all tested frequencies and at lower frequencies (2.8, 2.1, and 1.75 kHz) the emissions did not show an increase in response to increases in intensity, of the primaries. The sound conditioned group showed increases in distortion product amplitude with increases in the intensity of the primaries for all tested frequencies and statistically significant reductions from the pre-exposure values were not found. Surface preparations from the control group indicated that the traumatic noise exposure affected nearly 100% of the outer hair cells around the 14 mm distance from the round window. The sound conditioned group showed a significantly less (50%) outer hair cell loss than the control group. The sound conditioned group illustrated an altered pattern of damage after subsequent noise trauma. There were two distinct regions of outer hair cell loss, one being around the 16 mm distance and the other around the 12 mm distance from the round window. These results imply that the intrinsic properties of the outer hair cells and/or the organ of Corti have been altered by sound conditioning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7642444     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(95)00020-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  17 in total

1.  Evidence of hearing loss in a 'normally-hearing' college-student population.

Authors:  C G Le Prell; B N Hensley; K C M Campbell; J W Hall; K Guire
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Prolonged low-level noise-induced plasticity in the peripheral and central auditory system of rats.

Authors:  Adam M Sheppard; Guang-Di Chen; Senthilvelan Manohar; Dalian Ding; Bo-Hua Hu; Wei Sun; Jiwei Zhao; Richard Salvi
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Changes in purinoceptor distribution and intracellular calcium levels following noise exposure in the outer hair cells of the guinea pig.

Authors:  Attila Szucs; Henrietta Szappanos; Tamás J Batta; Andrea Tóth; Gyula P Szigeti; György Panyi; László Csernoch; István Sziklai
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2007-04-28       Impact factor: 1.843

4.  Gentamicin conditioning confers auditory protection against noise trauma.

Authors:  Alex Strose; Gleice Cristina Colombari; Maria Rossato; Miguel Ângelo Hyppolito; José Antônio Aparecido de Oliveira
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 5.  Is the din really harmless? Long-term effects of non-traumatic noise on the adult auditory system.

Authors:  Boris Gourévitch; Jean-Marc Edeline; Florian Occelli; Jos J Eggermont
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  Effects of Acoustic Environment on Tinnitus Behavior in Sound-Exposed Rats.

Authors:  Aikeen Jones; Bradford J May
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-01-02

Review 7.  The cochlear CRF signaling systems and their mechanisms of action in modulating cochlear sensitivity and protection against trauma.

Authors:  Christine E Graham; Johnvesly Basappa; Sevin Turcan; Douglas E Vetter
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2011-09-11       Impact factor: 5.590

8.  Sound preconditioning therapy inhibits ototoxic hearing loss in mice.

Authors:  Soumen Roy; Matthew M Ryals; Astrid Botty Van den Bruele; Tracy S Fitzgerald; Lisa L Cunningham
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  [Inner ear damage due to leisure and broadband noise. An experimental study on initial and permanent functional and morphological damage].

Authors:  K Lamm; C Michaelis; K Deingruber; R Scheler; H-J Steinhoff; I Gröber; M Huth; C Kutscher; W Arnold
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.284

10.  Noise-induced hearing loss and its prevention: Integration of data from animal models and human clinical trials.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell; Tanisha L Hammill; William J Murphy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.