Literature DB >> 7641929

Menses cup evaluation study.

M Cheng1, R Kung, M Hannah, D Wilansky, J Shime.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the menses cup is well tolerated by menstruating women.
DESIGN: Prospective descriptive clinical study.
SETTING: Normal human volunteers in an academic research environment. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-one menstruating women recruited between June to December 1991.
INTERVENTIONS: Each participant was provided with two menses cups and an instruction sheet. Baseline information, including age, occupation, martial status, parity, description of menstrual flow, and current method used to cope with menstrual flow was collected. Subjects were asked to describe their experience with the cup at 1-, 2-, 6-, and 12-month intervals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The proportion of women who found the cup acceptable.
RESULTS: The cup was used by 51 subjects for a total of 159 cycles. Overall, 23 women (45%) found the cup an acceptable method for coping with menses. Among 29 (57%) women who used the cup for two or more cycles, 62% found it acceptable.
CONCLUSION: The menses cup may be an acceptable method for some women for coping with menstrual flow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7641929

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  5 in total

1.  Preclinical, clinical, and over-the-counter postmarketing experience with a new vaginal cup: menstrual collection.

Authors:  Barbara B North; Michael J Oldham
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 2.  Outcome measures for heavy menstrual bleeding.

Authors:  Stephen D Quinn; Jenny Higham
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2015-12-23

3.  FLOW (finding lasting options for women): multicentre randomized controlled trial comparing tampons with menstrual cups.

Authors:  Courtney Howard; Caren Lee Rose; Konia Trouton; Holly Stamm; Danielle Marentette; Nicole Kirkpatrick; Sanja Karalic; Renee Fernandez; Julie Paget
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Menstrual cup use, leakage, acceptability, safety, and availability: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anna Maria van Eijk; Garazi Zulaika; Madeline Lenchner; Linda Mason; Muthusamy Sivakami; Elizabeth Nyothach; Holger Unger; Kayla Laserson; Penelope A Phillips-Howard
Journal:  Lancet Public Health       Date:  2019-07-16

5.  Comparison between menstrual cups: first step to categorization and improved safety.

Authors:  Hannah Manley; John A Hunt; Lívia Santos; Philip Breedon
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.