Literature DB >> 7640332

Histologic probe penetration in healthy and inflamed peri-implant tissues.

N P Lang1, A C Wetzel, H Stich, R G Caffesse.   

Abstract

Periodontal probing is commonly used for assessing both the status of gingival health and the connective tissue attachment level around teeth. The role of probing around endosseous implants still remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the histological level of probe penetration in healthy and inflamed mucosal tissues around implants. Five beagle dogs were used and a total of 30 one-stage, Titanium Plasma Spary (TPS)-coated implants of the ITI type were placed in the mandibles. After the healing period with meticulous oral hygiene, the dogs were divided into 3 groups: 1) clinical healthy mucosal tissues; 2) experimental mucositis (3 dogs); and 3) experimental ligature-induced peri-implantitis (2 dogs). Four months after implant placement, respectively 6 months in the third group, 60 probes were placed with a standardized force of 0.2 N and fixed at the mesial and distal aspects of the implants. Probing depth, clinical attachment level (CAL), Plaque Index (PlI) and Gingival Index (GI) were assessed throughout the study. Tissue sections were obtained for histometrical analysis. In the healthy group, the mean PII was 0.47, the GI 0.06 and the clinical probing depth (CPD) 2.12 mm. In the mucositis group the PlI was 1.61, the GI 1.61 and the CPD 1.87 mm. In the peri-implantitis group the PlI was 1.96, the GI 2.05 and the CPD 3.73 mm. The histologic results show that the probes were able to identify the connective tissue adhesion level in the healthy group with a mean error of -0.05 mm (mean histologic probing depth (HPD): 1.75 mm) and, in the mucositis group, with -0.02 mm (mean HPD: 1.62 mm). Probe penetration increased with the degree of inflammation and in the peri-implantitis group the probe exceeded the connective tissue level by a mean 0.52 mm (mean HPD: 3.8 mm). Therefore, probing around implants represents a good technique for assessing the status of peri-implant mucosal health or disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7640332     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050401.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  15 in total

1.  Nonsurgical treatment of moderate and advanced periimplantitis lesions: a controlled clinical study.

Authors:  Frank Schwarz; Katrin Bieling; Martin Bonsmann; Thilo Latz; Jürgen Becker
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2006-09-13       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Growth factor delivery for oral and periodontal tissue engineering.

Authors:  Darnell Kaigler; Joni A Cirelli; William V Giannobile
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 6.648

Review 3.  Peri-implantitis. Part 1: Scope of the problem.

Authors:  A Alani; M Kelleher; K Bishop
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 4.  Influence of subcrestal implant placement compared with equicrestal position on the peri-implant hard and soft tissues around platform-switched implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cristina Valles; Xavier Rodríguez-Ciurana; Marco Clementini; Mariana Baglivo; Blanca Paniagua; Jose Nart
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  The Effect of Platform Switching on Periimplant Crevicular Fluid Content During Early Wound Healing.

Authors:  Hua-Hong Chien; Hsiu-Wan Meng; Amy C Gross; Timothy D Eubank; Vedat O Yildiz; Binnaz Leblebicioglu
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.454

Review 6.  The diode laser as coadyuvant therapy in the non-surgical conventional treatment of peri-implant mucositis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rebeca Sánchez-Martos; Andrea Samman; Mattia Priami; Santiago Arias-Herrera
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-12-01

Review 7.  Implant Maintenance: A Clinical Update.

Authors:  Minkle Gulati; Vivek Govila; Vishal Anand; Bhargavi Anand
Journal:  Int Sch Res Notices       Date:  2014-07-09

Review 8.  Diagnostic Principles of Peri-Implantitis: a Systematic Review and Guidelines for Peri-Implantitis Diagnosis Proposal.

Authors:  Ausra Ramanauskaite; Gintaras Juodzbalys
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2016-09-09

9.  Ligature-induced peri-implant infection in crestal and subcrestal implants: a clinical and radiographic study in dogs.

Authors:  Baoxin Huang; Muzi Piao; Li Zhang; Xian'e Wang; Li Xu; Weidong Zhu; Huanxin Meng
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  In vivo evaluation of an antibacterial coating containing halogenated furanone compound-loaded poly(l-lactic acid) nanoparticles on microarc-oxidized titanium implants.

Authors:  Yicheng Cheng; Bo Gao; Xianghui Liu; Xianghui Zhao; Weige Sun; Huifang Ren; Jiang Wu
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2016-03-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.