Literature DB >> 7640229

Cellular kinetics in rectal cancer.

N H Terry1, M L Meistrich, L D Roubein, P M Lynch, R A Dubrow, T A Rich.   

Abstract

Measurements of dynamic tumour cell kinetic parameters, particularly the potential doubling time (Tpot) may have potential as predictive assays for treatment outcome after radiotherapy. This paper details the distributions of Tpot and other kinetic and DNA content parameters measured in rectal cancers. Biopsies were taken from 119 patients approximately 6 h after infusion of 200 mg m-2 bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd). The samples were analysed by bivariate DNA/BrdUrd flow cytometry. The primary purpose of the study was to measure the kinetic parameters of labelling index (LI), duration of S-phase (TS) and Tpot. Secondarily, tumour DNA ploidy (DNA index) and S-phase fractions (SPFs) were also estimated from the univariate DNA histograms. The 101 evaluable patients were classified according to clinical stage as T2 (n = 12), T3 (n = 53), T4 (n = 28) or recurrent tumours (n = 8). Of the evaluable tumours, 73 were DNA aneuploid. The median LI, TS, and Tpot of the aneuploid tumours were 21%, 20 h and 3.3 days respectively. The calculated LI, TS, and Tpot of diploid tumours were subject to uncertainties because of the contribution of normal cells. The LI and SPF of all tumours were, however, significantly (P < 0.001) correlated, having a correlation coefficient of only 0.76. The wide distributions of values for LI (quartiles 13.5%, 26.9%) and Tpot (quartiles 2.4, 5.6 days) that were found are necessary baseline information if these parameters are to be useful in individual treatment selection or as predictors of treatment outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7640229      PMCID: PMC2033968          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1995.351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  28 in total

1.  Evaluation of flow cytometric methods for determining population potential doubling times using cultured cells.

Authors:  N H Terry; R A White; M L Meistrich; D P Calkins
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1991

2.  A quantitative method for evaluating bivariate flow cytometric data obtained using monoclonal antibodies to bromodeoxyuridine.

Authors:  R A White; N H Terry
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1992

Review 3.  Consensus review of the clinical utility of DNA flow cytometry in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  K D Bauer; C B Bagwell; W Giaretti; M Melamed; R J Zarbo; T E Witzig; P S Rabinovitch
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1993

4.  The analysis and interpretation of DNA distributions measured by flow cytometry.

Authors:  P N Dean; J W Gray; F A Dolbeare
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1982-11

5.  Variations in the [3H]thymidine labeling of S-phase cells in solid mouse tumors.

Authors:  D C Allison; P F Ridolpho; S Anderson; K Bose
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Colorectal cancer. Dukes' stage, tumor site, preoperative plasma CEA level, and patient prognosis related to tumor DNA ploidy pattern.

Authors:  N A Scott; H S Wieand; C G Moertel; S S Cha; R W Beart; M M Lieber
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1987-12

7.  Simultaneous cytokinetic measurement of aneuploid tumors and associated diploid cells following continuous labelling with chlorodeoxyuridine.

Authors:  R A White; A Pollack; N H Terry
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1994-04-01

8.  Tumor progression by DNA flow cytometry in human colorectal cancer.

Authors:  W Giaretti; L Santi
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1990-04-15       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  An investigation of different methods of cell cycle analysis by flow cytometry in rectal cancer.

Authors:  N Scott; D Cross; M I Plumb; M F Dixon; P Quirke
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Intra-tumoral heterogeneity of tumour potential doubling times (Tpot) in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  M S Wilson; C M West; G D Wilson; S A Roberts; R D James; P F Schofield
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  8 in total

1.  Gender-related differences in repopulation and early tumor response to preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Anna Gasinska; Piotr Richter; Zbigniew Darasz; Joanna Niemiec; Krzysztof Bucki; Krzysztof Malecki; Andrzej Sokolowski
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Advancements in the delivery of epigenetic drugs.

Authors:  Samantha A Cramer; Isaac M Adjei; Vinod Labhasetwar
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 6.648

3.  Radiotherapy and risks of tumor regrowth or inducing second cancer.

Authors:  Emad Y Moawad
Journal:  Cancer Nanotechnol       Date:  2011-08-18

4.  Comparative lesion sequencing provides insights into tumor evolution.

Authors:  Siân Jones; Wei-Dong Chen; Giovanni Parmigiani; Frank Diehl; Niko Beerenwinkel; Tibor Antal; Arne Traulsen; Martin A Nowak; Christopher Siegel; Victor E Velculescu; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Joseph Willis; Sanford D Markowitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Efficacy of decitabine-loaded nanogels in overcoming cancer drug resistance is mediated via sustained DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) depletion.

Authors:  Sivakumar Vijayaraghavalu; Vinod Labhasetwar
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 8.679

6.  Systematic heterogeneity and prognostic significance of cell proliferation in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  R Palmqvist; A Oberg; C Bergström; J N Rutegård; B Zackrisson; R Stenling
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Bromodeoxyuridine labeling index as an indicator of early tumor response to preoperative radiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Anna Gasinska; Jan Skolyszewski; Tadeusz Popiela; Piotr Richter; Zbigniew Darasz; Krystyna Nowak; Joanna Niemiec; Beata Biesaga; Agnieszka Adamczyk; Krzysztof Bucki; Krzysztof Malecki; Marian Reinfuss; Teresa Kowalska
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Labelling indices in human tumours: to apply corrections or not--that is the question.

Authors:  C Bergström; A Begg; R Palmqvist; A Waites; J Denekamp
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 7.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.