Literature DB >> 7639431

The extraction-nonextraction dilemma as it relates to TMD.

R P McLaughlin1, J C Bennett.   

Abstract

Extraction has been a controversial subject for as long as the specialty of orthodontics has existed. Some authors believe that the extraction of premolars leads to temporomandibular disorders. This occurs, they say, because the vertical dimension collapses. Concomitantly, over-retraction and retroclination of the incisors cause the facial profile to flatten, bring about premature anterior contacts, and distally displace the mandible and mandibular condyle. Numerous correlation studies in the dental literature do not support this contention. There appears to be no higher incidence of temporomandibular disorders in patients treated with the extraction of premolars than in nontreated patients or those treated without extractions. Analysis of premolar extraction cases reveals that there is no collapse of the vertical dimension; on the contrary, the vertical dimension is either maintained or slightly opened. Similarly, there is no evidence that premolar extraction causes undesirable flattening of the facial profile. The facial profile established during treatment is primarily the result of diagnosis and treatment mechanics. Excessive anterior interferences resulting in possible posterior condyle displacement are the result of treatment mechanics. When arches are leveled properly and space closure and overjet reduction are adequately controlled, there is no reason that such interferences should occur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7639431     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1995)065<0175:TEDAIR>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  5 in total

1.  Short-term effects of systematic premolar extraction on lip profile, vertical dimension and cephalometric parameters in borderline patients for extraction therapy--a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Christian Kirschneck; Peter Proff; Claudia Reicheneder; Carsten Lippold
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Pretreatment dentoskeletal comparison between individuals treated with extractions in the 1970s and in the new millennium.

Authors:  Rodrigo Naveda; Guilherme Janson; Gabriela Manami Natsumeda; Marcos Roberto de Freitas; Leopoldino Capelozza-Filho; Daniela Garib
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Frequency evaluation of different extraction protocols in orthodontic treatment during 35 years.

Authors:  Guilherme Janson; Fábio Rogério Torres Maria; Roberto Bombonatti
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 2.750

4.  Orthodontic retreatment of an adult woman with mandibular backward positioning and temporomandibular joint disorder: A case report.

Authors:  Li-Yuan Yu; Kai Xia; Wen-Tian Sun; Xin-Qi Huang; Jing-Yu Chi; Ling-Jie Wang; Zhi-He Zhao; Jun Liu
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 1.337

5.  Mesiodistal angulation of posterior teeth in orthodontic patients with different facial growth patterns.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Badiee; Asghar Ebadifar; Sanaz Sajedi
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2019
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.