Literature DB >> 7636420

Towards a just, courageous, and honest resolution of the futility debate.

R Tong1.   

Abstract

This essay discusses the history of the "futility debate" and the motives that sometimes prompt health care professionals, health care providers, patients, and surrogates to take different sides in it. Changes in the health care system, financial responsibility shifts, technical medical advances, and medical care rationing are analyzed as contributors to the futility debate. So too are variations in the definition of futility examined as part of the current controversy. The respective attitudes of professionals, providers, patients, and surrogates in accepting the goals, capabilities, and limits of medicine are also explored. In particular, the lack of honest communication between health care professionals/health care providers on the one hand and patients/surrogates on the other is acknowledged as a major roadblock in the building of care-focused futility policies. Finally, various initial attempts of hospitals to create futility guidelines are evaluated in order to detect problem areas and to suggest lines of improvement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Death and Euthanasia

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7636420     DOI: 10.1093/jmp/20.2.165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Philos        ISSN: 0360-5310


  2 in total

1.  The role of futility judgments in improperly limiting the scope of clinical research.

Authors:  W Harper
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Treatment withdrawal of the patient on end of life: An analysis of values, ethics and guidelines in palliative care.

Authors:  Daniel A Nnate
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2021-02-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.