Literature DB >> 7636419

Is futility a futile concept?

B A Brody1, A Halevy.   

Abstract

This paper distinguishes four major types of futility (physiological, imminent demise, lethal condition, and qualitative) that have been advocated in the literature either in a patient dependent or a patient independent fashion. It proposes five criteria (precision, prospective, social acceptability, significant number, and non-agreement) that any definition of futility must satisfy if it is to serve as the basis for unilaterally limiting futile care. It then argues that none of the definitions that have been advocated meet the criteria, primarily because their proponents have not paid sufficient attention to the problematic nature of the data supporting the use of their definitions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American College of Physicians; American Heart Association; American Medical Association; American Thoracic Society; Analytical Approach; Death and Euthanasia; Society of Critical Care Medicine

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7636419     DOI: 10.1093/jmp/20.2.123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Philos        ISSN: 0360-5310


  21 in total

1.  Physicians' disagreements about life-sustaining treatments: a case study.

Authors:  L J Gordon; A H Weiss
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  1999-06

2.  Medical futility: towards consensus on disagreement.

Authors:  J T Berger; F Rosner; J Potash; P Kark; P Farnsworth; A J Bennett
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  1998-03

3.  Medical futility: a conceptual model.

Authors:  R K Mohindra
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  What medical futility means to clinicians.

Authors:  Mark R Tonelli
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2007-03

5.  Medical futility in the post-modern context.

Authors:  John Paul Slosar
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2007-03

6.  When Religion and Medicine Clash: Non-beneficial Treatments and Hope for a Miracle.

Authors:  Philip M Rosoff
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2019-06

7.  Perceptions of patients on the utility or futility of end-of-life treatment.

Authors:  K L Rodriguez; A J Young
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  The role of futility judgments in improperly limiting the scope of clinical research.

Authors:  W Harper
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 9.  A broader look at medical futility.

Authors:  W Shelton
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  1998-08

10.  Emergency surgery in patients in extremis from blunt torso injury: heroic surgery or futile care?

Authors:  A Brooks; B Davies; D Richardson; J Connolly
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.740

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.