Literature DB >> 7636368

Anorectal function after low anterior resection of the rectum.

J S Vassilakis1, G Pechlivanides, O J Zoras, N Vrachasotakis, E Chrysos, G Tzovaras, E Xynos.   

Abstract

Impaired neorectal function or sphincter incompetence have been respectively implicated as causative factors of increased frequency of defaecation or incontinence after low anterior resection of the rectum (LARR) for rectal carcinoma, although individual mechanisms of anorectal function have not been fully studied. Functional and laboratory results were evaluated in 19 subjects, who had a LARR for rectal carcinoma before and after the procedure, and were compared to those of normal subjects. LARR worsened anorectal function, mostly by significantly increasing the daily number of defaecations (p < 0.001), while major incontinence was reported in three cases. Patients with rectal carcinoma have a decreased resting anal pressure on manometry, as compared to controls (p < 0.001). LARR further reduces anal resting pressure (p < 0.001) as well as all parameters that express internal sphincter activity, such as presence and amplitude of either slow (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01) or ultraslow waves. LARR also impaired external anal sphincter activity, as expressed by the reduction in anal squeeze pressure (p < 0.001). Anorectal sampling was found reduced in incidence and frequency in LARR patients as compared to controls (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001), and was impaired even further postoperatively (p < 0.001). Rectoanal inhibitory reflex was present in all but three patients postoperative, but significantly impaired as compared to controls. Rectal volumes to elicit transient or permanent desire to defecate, maximal tolerable rectal volume and rectal compliance were also significantly reduced after LARR (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.01 and p < 0.001 respectively). Large bowel transit was significantly enhanced after LARR (p < 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7636368     DOI: 10.1007/bf00341207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  32 in total

1.  Preoperative and postoperative evaluation by manometric study of the anal sphincter after coloanal anastomosis for carcinoma.

Authors:  G Pappalardo; S Toccaceli; P Dionisio; G Castrini; B Ravo
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Effect of anterior resection on anal sphincter function.

Authors:  P G Horgan; P R O'Connell; C A Shinkwin; W O Kirwan
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  The physiological evaluation of operative repair for incontinence and prolapse.

Authors:  D C Bartolo; G S Duthie
Journal:  Ciba Found Symp       Date:  1990

4.  Possible role of the autonomic nervous system in sphincter impairment after restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  T Hallgren; S Fasth; D Delbro; S Nordgren; T Oresland; L Hultén
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  A survey of postoperative function after rectal anastomosis with circular stapling devices.

Authors:  P J McDonald; R J Heald
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Reappraisal of the 5 centimetre rule of distal excision for carcinoma of the rectum: a study of distal intramural spread and of patients' survival.

Authors:  N S Williams; M F Dixon; D Johnston
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  What affects continence after anterior resection of the rectum?

Authors:  G Batignani; I Monaci; F Ficari; F Tonelli
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Survival and recurrence after sphincter saving resection and abdominoperineal resection for carcinoma of the middle third of the rectum.

Authors:  N S Williams; D Johnston
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Clinical and manometric evaluation of anorectal function following low anterior resection with low anastomotic line using an EEA stapler for rectal cancer.

Authors:  S Nakahara; H Itoh; R Mibu; S Ikeda; Y Oohata; K Kitano; Y Nakamura
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Resection of the rectum with construction of a colonic reservoir and colo-anal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum.

Authors:  F Lazorthes; P Fages; P Chiotasso; J Lemozy; E Bloom
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  7 in total

1.  Usefulness of Anorectal Manometry for Diagnosing Continence Problems After a Low Anterior Resection.

Authors:  Audrius Dulskas; Narimantas E Samalavicius
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2016-06-30

2.  Prospective randomised trial comparing ileocaecal interposition and colon-J-pouch as rectal replacement after total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  A D Rink; F Haaf; N Knupper; K-H Vestweber
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Scintigraphic comparison of neorectal emptying between colonic J-pouch anastomosis and straight anastomosis after stapled low anterior resection.

Authors:  Yoshitake Sugamata; Yasuo Takase; Masatoshi Oya
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-04-04       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency in patients with or without soiling 5 years or more after low anterior resection for lower rectal cancer.

Authors:  Ryouichi Tomita; Seigo Igarashi; Taro Ikeda; Tsugumichi Koshinaga; Shigeru Fujisaki; Katsuhisa Tanjoh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Sacral nerve stimulation in patients after rectal resection--preliminary report.

Authors:  Brigitte Holzer; Harald R Rosen; Wolfgang Zaglmaier; Reinhold Klug; Bernhard Beer; Gabriele Novi; Rudolf Schiessel
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-02-16       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Sacral nerve terminal motor latency in patients with or without soiling more than 2 years after low anterior resection for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Ryouichi Tomita
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  The effect of neo-rectal wall properties on functional outcome after colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  Martijn P Gosselink; David D Zimmerman; Rachel L West; Wim C Hop; Ernst J Kuipers; W Rudolph Schouten
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 2.571

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.