Literature DB >> 7636050

Comparative efficacy and safety of a once-daily loratadine-pseudoephedrine combination versus its components alone and placebo in the management of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

E Bronsky1, P Boggs, S Findlay, S Gawchik, J Georgitis, H Mansmann, L Sholler, J Wolfe, E Meltzer, R Morris.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The treatment of symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis often requires the use of a decongestant to improve nasal congestion, along with an antihistamine to adequately control other nasal, as well as nonnasal symptoms.
METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study, 874 patients with moderate to severe symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis were treated with one of the following: SCH 434 QD (a combination of 10 mg of loratadine in the coating and 240 mg of pseudoephedrine sulfate in an extended-release core) once daily, 10 mg of loratadine once daily, 120 mg of pseudoephedrine sulfate every 12 hours, or placebo for 2 weeks.
RESULTS: SCH 434 QD was consistently superior to placebo in controlling the symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Composite symptom scores (total, total nasal, and total nonnasal) were reduced significantly in patients treated with SCH 434 QD as compared with placebo (p < 0.01). When compared with its individual components, reductions in mean symptom scores were consistently greater, numerically, in patients treated with SCH 434 QD than in patients who were treated with either loratadine or pseudoephedrine alone. SCH 434 QD was superior to pseudoephedrine in reducing nonnasal symptoms at all time points (p < 0.01), and superior to loratadine in relieving nasal stuffiness at end point (p < 0.01). In the physicians' evaluation of therapeutic response, the SCH 434 QD group had the greatest number of patients with a good or excellent response at end point (58%). All treatments were generally well tolerated with no serious or unusual adverse events. Insomnia and nervousness, adverse events commonly associated with pseudoephedrine, were noted in a significantly greater number of patients treated with SCH 434 QD or pseudoephedrine (p < or = 0.04) as compared with those treated with loratadine or placebo.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study demonstrate that SCH 434 QD is more effective than placebo or either of its components alone in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7636050     DOI: 10.1016/s0091-6749(95)70001-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0091-6749            Impact factor:   10.793


  8 in total

1.  A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study to compare the efficacy and safety of a once-daily loratadine-pseudoephedrine combination with that of a twice-daily loratadine-pseudoephedrine combination in the treatment of allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  Yen-An Chen; Kai-Ping Chang; Yaoh-Shiang Lin; Sheng-Po Hao
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Hay fever in adolescents and adults.

Authors:  Aziz Sheikh; Sukhmeet Singh Panesar; Sarah Salvilla; Sangeeta Dhami
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2009-11-18

3.  International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis.

Authors:  Sarah K Wise; Sandra Y Lin; Elina Toskala; Richard R Orlandi; Cezmi A Akdis; Jeremiah A Alt; Antoine Azar; Fuad M Baroody; Claus Bachert; G Walter Canonica; Thomas Chacko; Cemal Cingi; Giorgio Ciprandi; Jacquelynne Corey; Linda S Cox; Peter Socrates Creticos; Adnan Custovic; Cecelia Damask; Adam DeConde; John M DelGaudio; Charles S Ebert; Jean Anderson Eloy; Carrie E Flanagan; Wytske J Fokkens; Christine Franzese; Jan Gosepath; Ashleigh Halderman; Robert G Hamilton; Hans Jürgen Hoffman; Jens M Hohlfeld; Steven M Houser; Peter H Hwang; Cristoforo Incorvaia; Deborah Jarvis; Ayesha N Khalid; Maritta Kilpeläinen; Todd T Kingdom; Helene Krouse; Desiree Larenas-Linnemann; Adrienne M Laury; Stella E Lee; Joshua M Levy; Amber U Luong; Bradley F Marple; Edward D McCoul; K Christopher McMains; Erik Melén; James W Mims; Gianna Moscato; Joaquim Mullol; Harold S Nelson; Monica Patadia; Ruby Pawankar; Oliver Pfaar; Michael P Platt; William Reisacher; Carmen Rondón; Luke Rudmik; Matthew Ryan; Joaquin Sastre; Rodney J Schlosser; Russell A Settipane; Hemant P Sharma; Aziz Sheikh; Timothy L Smith; Pongsakorn Tantilipikorn; Jody R Tversky; Maria C Veling; De Yun Wang; Marit Westman; Magnus Wickman; Mark Zacharek
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.858

4.  Loratadine-pseudoephedrine in children with allergic rhinitis, a controlled double-blind trial.

Authors:  H A Serra; O Alves; L F Rizzo; F M Devoto; H Ascierto
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  Impact of allergic rhinitis treatment on quality of life.

Authors:  A Tripathi; R Patterson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Treatment of congestion in upper respiratory diseases.

Authors:  Eli O Meltzer; Fernan Caballero; Leonard M Fromer; John H Krouse; Glenis Scadding
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2010-04-08

7.  Rupatadine: pharmacological profile and its use in the treatment of allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  M Sudhakara Rao; D Dwarakanatha Reddy; P S N Murthy
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-01-09

Review 8.  Grading the severity of allergic rhinitis for treatment strategy and drug study purposes.

Authors:  M Okuda
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.919

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.