Literature DB >> 7635586

Cancer incidence in a group of workers potentially exposed to ethylene oxide.

S A Norman1, J A Berlin, K A Soper, B F Middendorf, P D Stolley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cytogenetic changes associated with ethylene oxide (ETO) exposure at a worksite prompted a study of cancer incidence in that cohort.
METHOD: Cancer incidence through 31 December 1987 was ascertained in a cohort of 1132 individuals employed at the worksite at any time from 1 July 1974 through 30 September 1980, the period of potential exposure to ETO at the plant. The number of observed cancers was compared with that expected based on age- and sex-specific incidence rates reported by the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Program. Standardized morbidity ratios (SMR) were calculated separately for regular and temporary employees.
RESULTS: Of the 28 cancers observed in the cohort, 12 were breast cancers. The SMR for breast cancer among regular female employees ranged from 2.55 (95% CI: 1.31-4.98, P = 0.02) to 1.70 (95% CI: 0.89-3.23, P = 0.09) depending on calendar year of follow-up, assumptions about completeness of follow-up, and the reference rates used. The excess of breast cancer over expected in regular female employees diminished over time. No statistically significant excess of breast cancer was noted for temporary female employees at any point during follow-up. No increase in cancer incidence was found over that expected for any cancer sites associated with ETO in previous studies--leukaemia, brain, pancreas and stomach.
CONCLUSIONS: Factors such as appropriateness of latency periods, length of follow-up and lack of a common histopathological type need to be considered in evaluating the excesses in observed breast cancer incidence, which diminished over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7635586     DOI: 10.1093/ije/24.2.276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   7.196


  9 in total

1.  Ethylene oxide and risk of lympho-hematopoietic cancer and breast cancer: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gary M Marsh; Kara A Keeton; Alexander S Riordan; Elizabeth A Best; Stacey M Benson
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Is breast cancer cluster influenced by environmental and occupational factors among hospital nurses in Hungary?

Authors:  A Tompa; J Major; M G Jakab
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 3.  State of the evidence 2017: an update on the connection between breast cancer and the environment.

Authors:  Janet M Gray; Sharima Rasanayagam; Connie Engel; Jeanne Rizzo
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 5.984

4.  Mortality analyses in a cohort of 18 235 ethylene oxide exposed workers: follow up extended from 1987 to 1998.

Authors:  K Steenland; L Stayner; J Deddens
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Mortality of workers exposed to ethylene oxide: extended follow up of a British cohort.

Authors:  D Coggon; E C Harris; J Poole; K T Palmer
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 6.  A review of the molecular mechanisms of chemically induced neoplasia in rat and mouse models in National Toxicology Program bioassays and their relevance to human cancer.

Authors:  Mark J Hoenerhoff; Hue Hua Hong; Tai-vu Ton; Stephanie A Lahousse; Robert C Sills
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.902

7.  Cancer incidence and mortality in Swedish sterilant workers exposed to ethylene oxide: updated cohort study findings 1972-2006.

Authors:  Zoli Mikoczy; Håkan Tinnerberg; Jonas Björk; Maria Albin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 8.  Ethylene Oxide: Cancer Evidence Integration and Dose-Response Implications.

Authors:  Melissa J Vincent; Jordan S Kozal; William J Thompson; Andrew Maier; G Scott Dotson; Elizabeth A Best; Kenneth A Mundt
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 9.  Environmental pollutants and breast cancer.

Authors:  Julia Green Brody; Ruthann A Rudel
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.031

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.