Literature DB >> 7635080

The origin of the human auditory brain-stem response wave II.

W H Martin1, H Pratt, J W Schwegler.   

Abstract

Auditory brain-stem responses (ABRs) were recorded from human subjects undergoing neurosurgical procedures which exposed the auditory nerve. Scalp recordings indicated that the latency of the negativity between waves I and II (In) and the latency of positive peak II (IIp) were shorter when the nerve was suspended in air than when the nerve was submerged in cerebrospinal fluid or saline, while earlier and later waves remained unaffected. These results could not be attributed to changes in stimulus or recording parameters or conduction velocity. Computational and somatosensory experimental evidence of stationary potentials generated by physical properties of the volume conductor, including changes in conductivity or geometry, are presented to develop a model of wave IIp generation. The results of this study suggest that wave IIp (and probably In) are manifestations of current flux asymmetries across conductivity boundaries created by the temporal bone-cerebrospinal fluid intradural space-brain-stem interfaces. The current flux asymmetries are generated as the propagating auditory nerve action potential crosses the conductivity boundaries. These results also indicate that the physical characteristics of the volume conductor and neural pathways must be considered when interpreting surface recorded evoked potentials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7635080     DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(94)00326-a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  7 in total

1.  Sources of auditory brainstem responses revisited: contribution by magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Lauri Parkkonen; Nobuya Fujiki; Jyrki P Mäkelä
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Analysis of Auditory Brainstem Response Change, according to Tinnitus Duration, in Patients with Tinnitus with Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Jae Woo Joo; Yong Jun Jeong; Mun Soo Han; Young-Soo Chang; Yoon Chan Rah; June Choi
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.017

3.  ASNM position statement: intraoperative monitoring of auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  William Hal Martin; Mark M Stecker
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.977

4.  Brainstem evoked potential in newly diagnosed patients of subclinical hypothyroidism.

Authors:  Kirti Sharma; Joshil Kumar Behera; Naresh Kumar; Sushma Sood; Harnam Singh Madan; Sibadatta Das
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2015-04

5.  High-resolution frequency tuning but not temporal coding in the human cochlea.

Authors:  Eric Verschooten; Christian Desloovere; Philip X Joris
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 8.029

6.  Brainstem auditory evoked potential in clinical hypothyroidism.

Authors:  Kirti Sharma; Naresh Kumar; Joshil Kumar Behera; Sushma Sood; Sibadatta Das; Harnam Singh Madan
Journal:  Avicenna J Med       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

7.  Peak I of the human auditory brainstem response results from the somatic regions of type I spiral ganglion cells: evidence from computer modeling.

Authors:  Frank Rattay; Simon M Danner
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.208

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.