Literature DB >> 7634581

Lipid extracted bank bone. Bone conductive and mechanical properties.

K Thorén1, P Aspenberg, K G Thorngren.   

Abstract

Lipid extraction by chloroform methanol previously has been found to increase the incorporation of frozen bone allografts. This effect may be because of a decreased immunologic response. In the present study, the ingrowth capacity into a grafted bone defect was investigated by using the bone harvest chamber model in rabbits. In a series of experiments, defatted and frozen allografts were compared at 1, 2, and 3 weeks; defatted allografts and defatted autografts were compared at 3 weeks; and frozen or defatted allografts and nongrafted defects were compared at 3 weeks. Evaluation was performed through histology, histomorphometry, and 99mTc-MDP scintimetry. The incorporation was better with defatted grafts: by histology at 1 week, mesenchymal tissue filled the intertrabecular space in defatted specimens and new bone formation started to occur. In contrast, frozen specimens showed a central soft tissue necrosis surrounded by inflammatory cells. Histomorphometry showed more new bone and more graft resorption in defatted allografts. At 2 and 3 weeks, there was no significant difference in new bone area, but at 3 weeks the scintimetric activity was higher in defatted allografts, probably caused by an increased remodeling rate. Since defatting did not cause increased scintimetric activity in previous autograft studies, these findings could indicate that there is a detrimental immunologic influence on frozen allografts. There were no differences between defatted autografts and allografts. In a second experiment, the biomechanical properties of defatted bone were investigated with a compression test on defatted and frozen bone cylinders taken from the calf femoral neck. No difference in biomechanical properties was found. It was concluded that lipid extraction produced a graft that was better incorporated than a nondefatted graft, with no loss of mechanical function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7634581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  7 in total

1.  [Allografts in reconstruction of osseous defects in primary malignant bone tumors].

Authors:  P Wuisman; F Gohlke; A Witlox
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  No effect of platelet-rich plasma with frozen or processed bone allograft around noncemented implants.

Authors:  T B Jensen; O Rahbek; S Overgaard; K Søballe
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Use of freeze-dried bone allografts in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Maurice Caltran; Claude Savornin; Patrick Le Couteur; Paul Jouan; Philippe Deroche; Jean-François Vinceneux; Laurence Barnouin
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2002-12-17

Review 4.  Allograft Bone as Antibiotic Carrier.

Authors:  Heinz Winkler; Peter Haiden
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2017-01-01

5.  Novel radiomics evaluation of bone formation utilizing multimodal (SPECT/X-ray CT) in vivo imaging.

Authors:  Ferenc Budán; Krisztián Szigeti; Miklós Weszl; Ildikó Horváth; Erika Balogh; Reem Kanaan; Károly Berényi; Zsombor Lacza; Domokos Máthé; Zoltán Gyöngyi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Incorporation and Remodeling of Structural Allografts in Acetabular Reconstruction: Multiscale, Micro-Morphological Analysis of 13 Pelvic Explants.

Authors:  Sebastian Butscheidt; Menard Moritz; Thorsten Gehrke; Klaus Püschel; Michael Amling; Michael Hahn; Tim Rolvien
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 7.  Bone allograft in the U.K.: perceptions and realities.

Authors:  Richard Lomas; Akila Chandrasekar; Timothy N Board
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 2.135

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.