Literature DB >> 7634570

Computed tomography analysis of proximal tibial coverage.

B N Stulberg1, R M Dombrowski, M Froimson, K Easley.   

Abstract

Researchers of this study used computed tomographic studies of the proximal tibia for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty to determine basic morphologic data of size, shape, and area of varying levels from the articular surface. Five off-the-shelf tibial component shapes (4 symmetric, 1 asymmetric) were templated to determine the fit of the components at the various resection levels. Seventy-two knees were assessed at 2-mm, 68 at 5-mm, 40 at 8-mm, and 17 at 11-mm resection levels. Significant differences in fit and percentage of total area of coverage were identified. Fit was significantly better for asymmetric as compared with the symmetric components (p = 0.001) at all levels of resection. Fit was significantly worse for each component as the resection depth increased. This information can serve as a bridge to clinical and laboratory data in identifying the importance of tibial component fit to the overall performance of a total knee arthroplasty design.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7634570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  11 in total

1.  Morphometrical measurement of resected surface of medial and lateral proximal tibia for Chinese population.

Authors:  Tsung-Wei Chang; Chang-Hung Huang; Colin J McClean; Yu-Shu Lai; Yung-Chang Lu; Cheng-Kung Cheng
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Anthropometric measurements of tibial plateau and correlation with the current tibial implants.

Authors:  Omer Faruk Erkocak; Fatih Kucukdurmaz; Safak Sayar; Mehmet Emin Erdil; Hasan Huseyin Ceylan; Ibrahim Tuncay
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Retrospective study of asymmetric vs symmetric tibial plates and ultracongruent vs posterior stabilized inserts in Indian population: An Indian experience of Natural Knee II.

Authors:  Ajay Deep Singh
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2016-07-26

4.  Oversizing the tibial component in TKAs: incidence, consequences and risk factors.

Authors:  Michel P Bonnin; Mo Saffarini; David Shepherd; Nadine Bossard; Emmanuelle Dantony
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Correlation of Anthropometric Measurements of Proximal Tibia in Iranian Knees with Size of Current Tibial Implants.

Authors:  Elham Karimi; Reza Zandi; Mohsen Norouzian; Ali Birjandinejad
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2019-07

6.  Tibial base design and patient morphology affecting tibial coverage and rotational alignment after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Chadd Clary; Luke Aram; Daren Deffenbaugh; Mark Heldreth
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Morphology of proximal tibia in Iranian population and its correlation with available prostheses.

Authors:  Mehdi Moghtadaei; Javad Moghimi; Hossein Farahini; Ali Jahansouz
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2015-06-30

8.  Can tibial coverage in total knee replacement be reliably evaluated with three-dimensional image-based digital templating?

Authors:  A J Costa; S Lustig; C J Scholes; J-C Balestro; M Fatima; D A Parker
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 5.853

9.  Anatomic tibial component design can increase tibial coverage and rotational alignment accuracy: a comparison of six contemporary designs.

Authors:  Yifei Dai; Giles R Scuderi; Jeffrey E Bischoff; Kim Bertin; Samih Tarabichi; Ashok Rajgopal
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Distal Femur Morphology of Iranian Population and Correlation With Current Prostheses.

Authors:  Mehdi Moghtadaei; Javad Moghimi; Gholamreza Shahhoseini
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 0.611

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.