Literature DB >> 7634568

Revision and primary hip and knee arthroplasty. A cost analysis.

C J Lavernia1, M K Drakeford, A K Tsao, A Gittelsohn, K A Krackow, D S Hungerford.   

Abstract

The cost of health care in the United States has been rising steadily during the past 10 years. Total joint arthroplasty, a commonly performed orthopaedic procedure, accounts for approximately $10 billion dollars per year. The objective of this study was to perform a clinician-oriented cost analysis of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty. Twenty-five consecutive cases each of total knee arthroplasty, total hip arthroplasty, revision total knee arthroplasty, and revision total hip arthroplasty were analyzed. The length of stay and number of minutes spent in the operating room were significantly higher for the patients with revision hip surgery than for the other groups. The total charges for the prosthesis in the 4 groups exceeded 40% of the total charges for the procedure. Primary hip and knee surgery had similar billed costs, and work for revision hip surgery has a significantly higher billed cost than physician's work. The implant selection process by an orthopaedic surgeon performing arthroplasty of the hip and knee needs to include economic aspects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7634568

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  16 in total

1.  Health status after hip or knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  C Jinks; M Lewis; P Croft
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  What is the Long-term Economic Societal Effect of Periprosthetic Infections After THA? A Markov Analysis.

Authors:  Thomas J Parisi; Joseph F Konopka; Hany S Bedair
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Health-related quality of life and mobility of patients awaiting elective total hip arthroplasty: a prospective study.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Mahon; Robert B Bourne; Cecil H Rorabeck; David H Feeny; Larry Stitt; Susan Webster-Bogaert
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-11-12       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Predictors of moderate-severe functional limitation 2 and 5 years after revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; Megan M O'Byrne; W Scott Harmsen; David G Lewallen
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Tissue integration of growth factor-eluting layer-by-layer polyelectrolyte multilayer coated implants.

Authors:  Mara L Macdonald; Raymond E Samuel; Nisarg J Shah; Robert F Padera; Yvette M Beben; Paula T Hammond
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  The Impact of Discharge Disposition on Episode-of-Care Reimbursement After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Karim G Sabeh; Samuel Rosas; Leonard T Buller; Martin W Roche; Victor H Hernandez
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Revision hip arthroplasty: infection is the most common cause of failure.

Authors:  S Mehdi Jafari; Catelyn Coyle; S M Javad Mortazavi; Peter F Sharkey; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Primary vs Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Cost Analysis.

Authors:  Garwin Chin; David J Wright; Nimrod Snir; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Fixation of hydroxyapatite-coated revision implants is improved by the surgical technique of cracking the sclerotic bone rim.

Authors:  Brian Elmengaard; Joan E Bechtold; Xinqian Chen; Kjeld Søballe
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Factors influencing inpatient rehabilitation length of stay following revision hip replacements: a retrospective study.

Authors:  So-Mei Teresa Yeung; Aileen M Davis; Rajka Soric
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.