BACKGROUND: Studies to assess quality of care have become increasingly important for research and policy purposes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the difference in quality of care between elderly depressed patients hospitalized in specialty psychiatric units and those hospitalized in general medical wards. METHODS: We reviewed retrospectively the medical charts of 2746 patients with depression hospitalized in 297 general medical hospitals in five different states. Quality of care was assessed by clinical review of explicit and implicit information contained in the medical records of patients in specialty psychiatric units (n = 1295) and general medical wards (n = 1451). We also used other secondary data sources to determine postdischarge outcomes. RESULTS: We found that (1) a higher percentage of admissions on the psychiatric units were considered appropriate, (2) overall psychological assessment was better on the psychiatric unit, (3) patients were more likely to receive psychological services on the psychiatric wards but more likely to receive traditional general medical services on medical wards, (4) there were more inpatient general medical complications on the psychiatric wards, and (5) implicit measures of clinical status at discharge were better for those on the psychiatric unit. CONCLUSIONS: Although limited by reliance on medical record abstraction and a retrospective study design, our data indicate that the quality of care for the psychological aspects of the treatment of depression may be better on psychiatric units, while the quality of general medical components of care may be better on general medical wards.
BACKGROUND: Studies to assess quality of care have become increasingly important for research and policy purposes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the difference in quality of care between elderly depressedpatients hospitalized in specialty psychiatric units and those hospitalized in general medical wards. METHODS: We reviewed retrospectively the medical charts of 2746 patients with depression hospitalized in 297 general medical hospitals in five different states. Quality of care was assessed by clinical review of explicit and implicit information contained in the medical records of patients in specialty psychiatric units (n = 1295) and general medical wards (n = 1451). We also used other secondary data sources to determine postdischarge outcomes. RESULTS: We found that (1) a higher percentage of admissions on the psychiatric units were considered appropriate, (2) overall psychological assessment was better on the psychiatric unit, (3) patients were more likely to receive psychological services on the psychiatric wards but more likely to receive traditional general medical services on medical wards, (4) there were more inpatient general medical complications on the psychiatric wards, and (5) implicit measures of clinical status at discharge were better for those on the psychiatric unit. CONCLUSIONS: Although limited by reliance on medical record abstraction and a retrospective study design, our data indicate that the quality of care for the psychological aspects of the treatment of depression may be better on psychiatric units, while the quality of general medical components of care may be better on general medical wards.
Authors: Enola Proctor; Nancy Morrow-Howell; Mi Jin Lee; Jessica Gledhill; Wayne Blinne Journal: J Behav Health Serv Res Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 1.505
Authors: Bruce E Landon; Ira B Wilson; Susan E Cohn; Carl J Fichtenbaum; Mitchell D Wong; Neil S Wenger; Samuel A Bozzette; Martin F Shapiro; Paul D Cleary Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Claire M Spettell; Terry C Wall; Jeroan Allison; Jaimee Calhoun; Richard Kobylinski; Rachel Fargason; Catarina I Kiefe Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Bruce E Landon; Ira B Wilson; Neil S Wenger; Susan E Cohn; Carl J Fichtenbaum; Samuel A Bozzette; Martin F Shapiro; Paul D Cleary Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 5.128