Literature DB >> 7629525

Recurrent stroke after transient ischaemic attack or minor ischaemic stroke: does the distinction between small and large vessel disease remain true to type? Dutch TIA Trial Study Group.

L J Kappelle1, J C van Latum, J C van Swieten, A Algra, P J Koudstaal, J van Gijn.   

Abstract

The incidence and vascular type of recurrent ischaemic stroke was studied in patients with supratentorial transient ischaemic attacks or non-disabling ischaemic strokes, who were treated with aspirin (30 or 283 mg). Patients were divided into groups with small vessel disease (SVD) (n = 1216) or large vessel disease (LVD) (n = 1221) on the grounds of their clinical features and CT at baseline. Patients with evidence of both SVD and LVD (n = 180) were excluded from further analyses. During follow up (mean 2.6 years) annual stroke rate was 3.6% in both groups. Of the 107 patients with SVD at baseline who had recurrent strokes, 83 proved to have an identifiable infarct: 30 (28%) again had a small vessel infarct, 39 (36%) had a large vessel ischaemic stroke and in 14 (13%) the recurrent ischaemic stroke was in the posterior fossa. Of the 110 patients with LVD at baseline and recurrent stroke, 91 had an identifiable infarct: 67 (61%) again had a large vessel ischaemic stroke, 16 (15%) had a small vessel ischaemic stroke, and eight (7%) had the recurrent ischaemic stroke in the posterior fossa. Thus patients with a transient ischaemic attack or non-disabling ischaemic stroke caused by LVD were more likely to have an ischaemic stroke of the same vessel type during follow up than patients with SVD (relative risk 2.2; 95% confidence interval 1.5-3.4). Possible explanations for this difference are: (1) patients with a small vessel ischaemic stroke at baseline had both SVD and LVD or were misdiagnosed; (2) recurrent small vessel ischaemic stroke may have occurred more often than reported, because they were silent or only minimally disabling; (3) recurring large vessel ischaemic strokes occurring in patients initially diagnosed as having SVD might have been related to potential cardiac sources of emboli that had not been previously recognized; (4) the antiplatelet drug aspirin (30 or 283 mg) prescribed in this patient group may have prevented thrombosis in small vessels better than in large vessels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7629525      PMCID: PMC485986          DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.59.2.127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  21 in total

Review 1.  Evolution and testing of the lacunar hypothesis.

Authors:  J M Bamford; C P Warlow
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Clinical and radiologic features of lacunar versus nonlacunar minor stroke.

Authors:  B Norrving; S Cronqvist
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 3.  Intracranial branch atheromatous disease: a neglected, understudied, and underused concept.

Authors:  L R Caplan
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients.

Authors:  J M Bamford; P A Sandercock; C P Warlow; J Slattery
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Clinical and instrumental evaluation of patients with ischemic stroke within the first six hours.

Authors:  C Fieschi; C Argentino; G L Lenzi; M L Sacchetti; D Toni; L Bozzao
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.181

6.  The natural history of lacunar infarction: the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project.

Authors:  J Bamford; P Sandercock; L Jones; C Warlow
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1987 May-Jun       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Long-term prognosis of symptomatic lacunar infarcts. A hospital-based study.

Authors:  I Clavier; M Hommel; G Besson; B Noèlle; J E Perret
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  The Lausanne Stroke Registry: analysis of 1,000 consecutive patients with first stroke.

Authors:  J Bogousslavsky; G Van Melle; F Regli
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Carotid angiography in patients with lacunar infarction. A prospective study.

Authors:  L J Kappelle; P J Koudstaal; J van Gijn; L M Ramos; J E Keunen
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Capsular infarcts: the underlying vascular lesions.

Authors:  C M Fisher
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1979-02
View more
  4 in total

1.  Risk factors and outcome of patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis presenting with lacunar stroke.

Authors:  Amir Khan; Scott E Kasner; Michael J Lynn; Marc I Chimowitz
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Type of stroke after transient monocular blindness or retinal infarction of presumed arterial origin.

Authors:  E L L M De Schryver; A Algra; R C J M Donders; J van Gijn; L J Kappelle
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2006-02-24       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Mechanisms of second and further strokes.

Authors:  H Yamamoto; J Bogousslavsky
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Recurrent mild cerebral ischemia: enhanced brain injury following acute compared to subacute recurrence in the rat.

Authors:  Ursula I Tuor; Zonghang Zhao; Philip A Barber; Min Qiao
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 3.288

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.