Literature DB >> 7629286

Comparative analysis of human papillomavirus detection by PCR and non-isotopic in situ hybridisation.

C S Herrington1, S M Anderson, H M Bauer, B Troncone, M L de Angelis, H Noell, J A Chimera, S L Van Eyck, J O McGee.   

Abstract

AIMS--To assess the relative diagnostic performance of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and non-isotopic in situ hybridisation (NISH) and to correlate these data with cytopathological assessment. METHODS--Paired analysis of human papillomavirus (HPV) detection was performed by PCR and NISH on exfoliated cervical cells from 122 women attending a routine gynaecological examination. PCR amplification followed by generic and HPV type specific hybridisation was compared with NISH on a parallel cervical smear. RESULTS--Overall, 32 cases were positive by NISH and 61 positive by PCR. Of the 105 cases in which both PCR and NISH were interpretable, 76 (26%) were normal smears, 20 of which were HPV positive by NISH and 37 (49%) by PCR. Of 17 borderline smears, two were NISH positive and 12 PCR positive. Eight of nine smears containing koilocytes were positive by NISH and seven by PCR. Of three dyskaryotic smears, none were NISH and two were PCR positive. The concordance of NISH and PCR in these samples was 57%. To assess sampling error, NISH and PCR were performed on an additional 50 cases using aliquots from the same sample. This increased the concordance between assays to 74%. Filter hybridisation of PCR products with the cocktail of probes used in NISH (under low and high stringency conditions) demonstrated that several cases of NISH positivity could be accounted for by cross-hybridisation to HPV types identified by PCR but not present in the NISH probe cocktail. CONCLUSIONS--Sampling error and potential cross-hybridisation of probe and target should be considered in interpretation of these techniques. PCR is more sensitive because it provides for the amplification of target DNA sequences. In addition, the PCR assay utilised in this study detects a wider range of HPV types than are contained in the cocktails used for NISH. However, PCR assays detect viral DNA present both within cells and in cervical fluid whereas NISH permits morphological localisation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7629286      PMCID: PMC502615          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.48.5.415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  19 in total

1.  HPV16 DNA and prediction of high-grade CIN.

Authors:  C S Herrington; M F Evans; W Gray; J O McGee; N Hallam; F M Charnock
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-05-30       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Chromosomal integration sites of human papillomavirus DNA in three cervical cancer cell lines mapped by in situ hybridization.

Authors:  A Mincheva; L Gissmann; H zur Hausen
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Human papillomavirus infection of the uterine cervix of women without cytological signs of neoplasia.

Authors:  P G Toon; J R Arrand; L P Wilson; D S Sharp
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-11-15

4.  Human and viral gene detection in routine paraffin embedded tissue by in situ hybridisation with biotinylated probes: viral localisation in herpes encephalitis.

Authors:  J Burns; D R Redfern; M M Esiri; J O McGee
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Comparative analysis of human papillomavirus detection by dot blot hybridisation and non-isotopic in situ hybridisation.

Authors:  G Troncone; S M Anderson; C S Herrington; M L de Angelis; H Noell; J A Chimera; J O'D McGee
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Human papillomavirus detection by hybrid capture and its possible clinical use.

Authors:  A Farthing; P Masterson; W P Mason; K H Vousden
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  The discrimination of high-risk HPV types by in situ hybridization and the polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  C S Herrington; S M Anderson; A K Graham; J O McGee
Journal:  Histochem J       Date:  1993-03

8.  Human papillomavirus type 16 in cervical smears as predictor of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [corrected].

Authors:  J Cuzick; G Terry; L Ho; T Hollingworth; M Anderson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-04-18       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Progressive potential of mild cervical atypia: prospective cytological, colposcopic, and virological study.

Authors:  M J Campion; D J McCance; J Cuzick; A Singer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-08-02       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Type-specific human papillomavirus DNA in abnormal smears as a predictor of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  J Cuzick; G Terry; L Ho; T Hollingworth; M Anderson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  1 in total

1.  Use of multiple PCR primer sets for optimal detection of human papillomavirus.

Authors:  F Karlsen; M Kalantari; A Jenkins; E Pettersen; G Kristensen; R Holm; B Johansson; B Hagmar
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.948

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.