Literature DB >> 7629247

Selective venous sampling from the cavernous sinuses is not a more reliable technique than sampling from the inferior petrosal sinuses in Cushing's syndrome.

J L Doppman1, L K Nieman, R Chang, J Yanovski, G B Cutler, G P Chrousos, E H Oldfield.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare ACTH levels in unstimulated samples obtained from the cavernous sinuses (CS) to unstimulated and CRH-stimulated samples obtained from the inferior petrosal sinuses (IPS) in 15 patients with surgically proven Cushing's disease. After unstimulated samples were obtained through 5-French catheters placed in both IPS, tracker catheters were introduced into both cavernous sinuses, and unstimulated samples were obtained within 5 min of the initial set. The Tracker catheters were removed, CRH was administered, and CRH-stimulated samples were obtained from the IPS. We compared the central to peripheral ACTH ratios in unstimulated samples from the cavernous sinuses to unstimulated and CRH-stimulated samples from the IPS as a basis for distinguishing pituitary from ectopic ACTH production. In addition, we compared the ability of the intercavernous and interpetrosal ACTH ratios to correctly predict the site of the microadenoma. Unstimulated levels of ACTH in the cavernous sinuses were generally higher than unstimulated levels of ACTH in the petrosal sinuses. However, 3 of 15 patients failed to show central to peripheral ACTH ratios greater than 2 in unstimulated samples from the cavernous sinuses and were thus falsely negative for the diagnosis of Cushing's disease (test sensitivity, 80%). By comparison, the test sensitivity for the petrosal sinus samples was 87% for the unstimulated samples and 100% for the CRH-stimulated samples. Lateralization was correct in 6 of 15 patients based on CS samples and in 9 of 15 patients based on IPS samples. Because of the 20% false negative rate, CS sampling without CRH stimulation is not recommended for the differential diagnosis of ACTH-dependent hypercortisolism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7629247     DOI: 10.1210/jcem.80.8.7629247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  9 in total

1.  Inferior petrosal sinus sampling: pros and cons; when and where.

Authors:  J W Findling
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  Abstracts of the 8th International Pituitary Pathology Meeting. October 5-9, 2001. Greece.

Authors: 
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.943

3.  Perils and pitfalls in the diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome.

Authors:  K C Loh; P A Fitzgerald; T R Miller; J B Tyrrell
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1998-07

4.  Selective inferior petrosal sinus sampling without venous outflow diversion in the detection of a pituitary adenoma in Cushing's syndrome.

Authors:  Lukas Andereggen; Gerhard Schroth; Jan Gralla; Rolf Seiler; Luigi Mariani; Jürgen Beck; Hans-Rudolf Widmer; Robert H Andres; Emanuel Christ; Christoph Ozdoba
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 5.  Cushing's disease: a surgical view.

Authors:  D K Lüdecke; J Flitsch; U J Knappe; W Saeger
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Preliminary Experience with 3-Tesla MRI and Cushing's Disease.

Authors:  Louis J Kim; Gregory P Lekovic; William L White; John Karis
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2007-07

Review 7.  Pitfalls in Performing and Interpreting Inferior Petrosal Sinus Sampling: Personal Experience and Literature Review.

Authors:  Jordan E Perlman; Philip C Johnston; Ferdinand Hui; Guy Mulligan; Robert J Weil; Pablo F Recinos; Divya Yogi-Morren; Roberto Salvatori; Debraj Mukherjee; Gary Gallia; Laurence Kennedy; Amir H Hamrahian
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 8.  Bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling.

Authors:  Benedetta Zampetti; Erika Grossrubatscher; Paolo Dalino Ciaramella; Edoardo Boccardi; Paola Loli
Journal:  Endocr Connect       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 3.335

Review 9.  Dural Venous System in the Cavernous Sinus: A Literature Review and Embryological, Functional, and Endovascular Clinical Considerations.

Authors:  Yutaka Mitsuhashi; Koji Hayasaki; Taichiro Kawakami; Takashi Nagata; Yuta Kaneshiro; Ryoko Umaba; Kenji Ohata
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 1.742

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.