Literature DB >> 7628351

Repression of endogenous estrogen receptor activity in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells by dominant negative estrogen receptors.

B A Ince1, D J Schodin, D J Shapiro, B S Katzenellenbogen.   

Abstract

We have investigated the ability of several transcriptionally inactive estrogen receptor (ER) mutants to block endogenous ER-mediated transcription in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. In transient transfections of MCF-7 cells, two of the mutants, a frame-shifted ER (S554fs) and a point-mutated ER (L540Q), strongly inhibit the ability of endogenous wild-type ER to activate transcription of estrogen-regulated reporter plasmids. A third mutant, ER1-530, which is missing 65 residues from its carboxy-terminus, is a weaker repressor of estradiol-stimulated transcription. When an estrogen response element (ERE)-thymidine kinase-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter gene is used, S554fs, L540Q, and ER1-530 suppress the transcriptional activity of endogenous MCF-7 ER by 87%, 97%, and 62%, respectively. The magnitude of dominant negative repression is promoter specific; when an ERE-pS2-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter is employed, inhibition of endogenous ER activity by equivalent amounts of S554fs, L540Q, and ER1-530 ranges from 85-97%. Dose-response studies show the S554fs mutant to be the most potent of the three ER mutants as a repressor of estrogen action in these cells. In addition, elevated levels of intracellular cAMP, achieved by the addition of 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine plus cholera toxin to cells, fail to compromise the effectiveness of these mutants as dominant negative ERs despite the cAMP-enhanced transcriptional activity of ER. The mutants are also powerful repressors of the agonist activity of trans-hydroxytamoxifen-stimulated ER transcription. The dominant negative activity of the three mutants is lost when the A/B domain of these receptors is deleted, implying an important role for this N-terminal region of the ER in the ability of these mutants to inhibit endogenous wild-type ER activity. All in all, the data suggest that S554fs in particular is a reasonable candidate for studies designed to use a dominant negative ER to inhibit the estrogen- and tamoxifen-stimulated growth of human breast cancer cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7628351     DOI: 10.1210/endo.136.8.7628351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endocrinology        ISSN: 0013-7227            Impact factor:   4.736


  10 in total

1.  Inhibition of growth of cervical cancer cells using a dominant negative estrogen receptor gene.

Authors:  William W Au; Salama Abdou-Salama; Ayman Al-Hendy
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  An estrogen receptor-selective coregulator that potentiates the effectiveness of antiestrogens and represses the activity of estrogens.

Authors:  M M Montano; K Ekena; R Delage-Mourroux; W Chang; P Martini; B S Katzenellenbogen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Structural underpinnings of oestrogen receptor mutations in endocrine therapy resistance.

Authors:  John A Katzenellenbogen; Christopher G Mayne; Benita S Katzenellenbogen; Geoffrey L Greene; Sarat Chandarlapaty
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  Estrogen receptor α AF-2 mutation results in antagonist reversal and reveals tissue selective function of estrogen receptor modulators.

Authors:  Yukitomo Arao; Katherine J Hamilton; Manas K Ray; Gregory Scott; Yuji Mishina; Kenneth S Korach
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  POU transcription factors Brn-3a and Brn-3b interact with the estrogen receptor and differentially regulate transcriptional activity via an estrogen response element.

Authors:  V Budhram-Mahadeo; M Parker; D S Latchman
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Ligand-dependent switching of ubiquitin-proteasome pathways for estrogen receptor.

Authors:  Yukiyo Tateishi; Yoh-ichi Kawabe; Tomoki Chiba; Shigeo Murata; Ken Ichikawa; Akiko Murayama; Keiji Tanaka; Tadashi Baba; Shigeaki Kato; Junn Yanagisawa
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2004-11-11       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 7.  Gene therapy of benign gynecological diseases.

Authors:  Memy H Hassan; Essam E Othman; Daniela Hornung; Ayman Al-Hendy
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 8.  The multifunctional estrogen receptor-alpha F domain.

Authors:  Debra F Skafar; Changqing Zhao
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 3.633

9.  Progression of mouse skin carcinogenesis is associated with increased ERα levels and is repressed by a dominant negative form of ERα.

Authors:  Stella Logotheti; Dimitra Papaevangeliou; Ioannis Michalopoulos; Maria Sideridou; Katerina Tsimaratou; Ioannis Christodoulou; Katerina Pyrillou; Vassilis Gorgoulis; Spiros Vlahopoulos; Vassilis Zoumpourlis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Preliminary Pharmacogenomic-Based Predictive Models of Tamoxifen Response in Hormone-dependent Chilean Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Carla Miranda; Macarena Galleguillos; Roberto Torres; Karla Tardón; Dante D Cáceres; Kuen Lee; María A Redal; Nelson M Varela; Luis A Quiñones
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 5.810

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.