Literature DB >> 7628260

Anismus as a marker of sexual abuse. Consequences of abuse on anorectal motility.

A M Leroi1, I Berkelmans, P Denis, M Hémond, G Devroede.   

Abstract

Anorectal manometry was performed in 40 women, who consulted for functional disorders of the lower gastrointestinal tract and had been sexually abused. Anismus, defined as a rise in anal pressure during straining, was observed in 39 of 40 abused women, but in only six of 20 healthy control women (P < 0.0001). Other parameters of anorectal manometry were compared with those observed in another control group composed of 31 nonabused women but with anismus, as well as the group of healthy controls. A decreased amplitude of anal voluntary contraction and an increased threshold volume in perception of rectal distension were observed in both abused and nonabused patients. A decreased amplitude of rectoanal inhibitory reflex, little rise in rectal pressure upon straining, frequent absence of initial contraction during rectal distension, and increased resting pressure at the lower part of the anal canal were observed in abused but not in nonabused patients, suggesting that these abnormalities, in association with anismus, suggest a pattern of motor activity in the anal canal that could be indicative of sexual abuse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7628260     DOI: 10.1007/bf02285184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  13 in total

Review 1.  Anorectal manometry. A collective international experience.

Authors:  P D Meunier
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin Biol       Date:  1991

2.  Medical problems of adults who were sexually abused in childhood.

Authors:  R P Arnold; D Rogers; D A Cook
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-03-17

3.  Response of the anal canal to repeated distension of the rectum.

Authors:  P Arhan; G Devroede; B Persoz; C Faverdin; C Dornic; D Pellerin
Journal:  Clin Invest Med       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 0.825

4.  Function of the striated anal sphincter during straining in control subjects and constipated patients with a radiologically normal rectum or idiopathic megacolon.

Authors:  P R Barnes; J E Lennard-Jones
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Functional abdominal pain, psychiatric illness, and life events.

Authors:  F Creed; T Craig; R Farmer
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Sexual and physical abuse in women with functional or organic gastrointestinal disorders.

Authors:  D A Drossman; J Leserman; G Nachman; Z M Li; H Gluck; T C Toomey; C M Mitchell
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1990-12-01       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Measuring the anorectal angle.

Authors:  M Hero; P Arhan; G Devroede; B Jehannin; C Faverdin; C Babin; D Pellerin
Journal:  J Biomed Eng       Date:  1985-10

8.  Biofeedback training for constipation in adults and children.

Authors:  J Weber; P Ducrotte; J Y Touchais; C Roussignol; P Denis
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Megarectum.

Authors:  A Verduron; G Devroede; M Bouchoucha; P Arhan; J C Schang; J Poisson; M Hémond; M Hébert
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Identifying and treating the sexual repercussions of incest: a couples therapy approach.

Authors:  W Maltz
Journal:  J Sex Marital Ther       Date:  1988
View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Functional disorders of the anus and rectum.

Authors:  W E Whitehead; A Wald; N E Diamant; P Enck; J H Pemberton; S S Rao
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  Recommendations on chronic constipation (including constipation associated with irritable bowel syndrome) treatment.

Authors:  P Paré; Ronald Bridges; Malcolm C Champion; Subhas C Ganguli; James R Gray; E Jan Irvine; Victor Plourde; Pierre Poitras; Geoffrey K Turnbull; Paul Moayyedi; Nigel Flook; Stephen M Collins
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.522

3.  Paradoxical puborectalis contraction and increased perineal descent.

Authors:  Ron G Landmann; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-05

Review 4.  Dyssynergic defecation and biofeedback therapy.

Authors:  Satish S C Rao
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.806

5.  Pelvic outlet obstruction.

Authors:  Orit Kaidar-Person; Seth A Rosen; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-08

6.  Efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: results of a multicenter double-blind crossover study.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Leroi; Yann Parc; Paul-Antoine Lehur; François Mion; Xavier Barth; Eric Rullier; Laurent Bresler; Guillaume Portier; Francis Michot
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  A randomized controlled trial of anorectal biofeedback for constipation.

Authors:  Stacey L Hart; Janet Waimin Lee; Julia Berian; Taryn R Patterson; Amanda Del Rosario; Madhulika G Varma
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Functional anorectal disorders.

Authors:  Melissa L Times; Craig A Reickert
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-05

9.  Constipation in 44 patients implanted with an artificial bowel sphincter.

Authors:  Syrine Gallas; Anne-Marie Leroi; Valérie Bridoux; Benoît Lefebure; Jean-Jacques Tuech; Françis Michot
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Sexual and physical abuse are not associated with rectal hypersensitivity in patients with irritable bowel syndrome.

Authors:  Y Ringel; W E Whitehead; B B Toner; N E Diamant; Y Hu; H Jia; S I Bangdiwala; D A Drossman
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.