Literature DB >> 7628027

Butorphanol: an opioid for day-care paediatric surgery.

W M Splinter1, H V O'Brien, L Komocar.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the side effects and efficacy of equianalgesic doses of morphine (M) and butorphanol (B) in children undergoing similar surgical procedures associated with moderate postoperative pain. We studied 156 healthy children aged 1.5-13 yr who underwent elective inguinal herniorrhaphy or orchidopexy. After induction of anaesthesia subjects were given 150 micrograms.kg-1 M or 30 micrograms.kg-1 B following a randomized, stratified, blocked and double-blind design. A standardized anaesthetic was administered, which included 1.5% halothane, vecuronium, droperidol and mechanical ventilation. The postsurgical four-hour follow-up included assessment of pain, vomiting and respiratory depression. Pain was assessed with mCHEOPS and analgesics were administered when indicated in the recovery room. Each opioid was administered to a group of 78 patients. Within each group, 25 subjects had an iv induction, 21 children had an orchidopexy and 57 had inguinal hernia repairs. The groups were similar with respect to age, weight, and length of surgery. The choice of opioid did not affect recovery times from anaesthesia. Analgesic requirements were similar among the groups. Ten minutes after arrival in the recovery room the B-subjects had a lower pain score than the M-patients. Postoperative vomiting was less among the B-subjects: 14% vs 28%, P = 0.03. Two M-patients required an unscheduled admission to hospital because of vomiting. It is concluded that butorphanol has few advantages over morphine in the population studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7628027     DOI: 10.1007/BF03011685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  12 in total

1.  A comparison of postoperative analgesia provided by wound infiltration or caudal analgesia.

Authors:  M Schindler; M Swann; M Crawford
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 1.669

2.  A postanesthetic recovery score.

Authors:  J A Aldrete; D Kroulik
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1970 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Respiratory effects of butorphanol and pethidine.

Authors:  T Kallos; F S Caruso
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1979 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  Influence of age on the pharmacokinetics of butorphanol.

Authors:  R Ramsey; M Higbee; J Maesner; J Wood
Journal:  Acute Care       Date:  1988

5.  Comparison of the sedative effects of butorphanol and midazolam.

Authors:  M Dershwitz; C E Rosow; P M DiBiase; A Zaslavsky
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Double-blind comparison of intravenously injected butorphanol and meperidine in parturients.

Authors:  E J Quilligan; K A Keegan; M J Donahue
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.561

7.  Comparison of two regional techniques for postoperative analgesia in children following herniotomy and orchidopexy.

Authors:  G D Cross; R F Barrett
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 6.955

8.  Comparison of fentanyl and butorphanol for outpatient anaesthesia.

Authors:  S K Pandit; S P Kothary; U A Pandit; M K Mathai
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 9.  Butorphanol in perspective.

Authors:  C E Rosow
Journal:  Acute Care       Date:  1988

10.  Butorphanol compared with fentanyl in general anaesthesia for ambulatory laparoscopy.

Authors:  B K Philip; D A Scott; D Freiberger; R R Gibbs; C Hunt; E Murray
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 5.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.