Literature DB >> 7627515

Manometric assessment of the effect of the diaphragmatic crural sling in gastro-oesophageal reflux: implications for surgical management.

N Peck1, N Callander, A Watson.   

Abstract

A manometric method to measure the effect of contraction of the crural sling of the diaphragm on intraoesophageal pressure is described. The manometric crural pressure was measured in 57 patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, documented by 24-h ambulatory pH monitoring, and compared between patients with and without hiatal hernia. Repeat measurements were made in 33 patients who underwent antireflux surgery that incorporated a crural repair. Mean crural pressure in 41 patients with hiatal hernia was 5.0 mmHg, compared with 15.0 mmHg in 16 without hiatal hernia (P < 0.01). In the 33 patients undergoing antireflux surgery, mean crural pressure rose from 7.1 mmHg before operation to 11.6 mmHg afterwards (P < 0.02) overall, and from 4.7 to 10.1 mmHg (P < 0.01) in the 26 patients with hiatal hernia. These results confirm a measurable contribution of the diaphragmatic crural sling to resting pressure at the high-pressure zone. The crural pressure is deficient in patients with hiatal hernia compared with that in those with reflux but no hernia. The mean crural pressure is increased in patients by antireflux surgery, particularly in those with hiatal hernia. The results provide objective support for the role of the crural diaphragm in the antireflux mechanism and the rationale of performing crural repair during antireflux surgery, particularly in the presence of hiatal hernia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7627515     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800820626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  8 in total

1.  Architecture and function of the gastroesophageal barrier in the piglet.

Authors:  Y Vicente; C Da Rocha; J Yu; G Hernandez-Peredo; L Martinez; B Pérez-Mies; J A Tovar
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Muscular architecture and manometric image of gastroesophageal barrier in the rat.

Authors:  S Montedonico; J Godoy; A Mate; A K Possögel; J A Diez-Pardo; J A Tovar
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Heartburn in patients with achalasia.

Authors:  G S Robertson; P S Veitch; A C Wicks
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Gastroesophageal reflux after combined lower esophageal sphincter and diaphragmatic crural sling inactivation in the rat.

Authors:  S Montedonico; J A Diez-Pardo; J A Tovar
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Identification of diaphragmatic crural component of gastroesophageal barrier in the rat.

Authors:  C Soto; B Qi; J A Diez-Pardo; J A Tovar
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Pharmacological dissection of the human gastro-oesophageal segment into three sphincteric components.

Authors:  James G Brasseur; Rhys Ulerich; Qing Dai; Dalipkumar K Patel; Ahmed M S Soliman; Larry S Miller
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  A missing sphincteric component of the gastro-oesophageal junction in patients with GORD.

Authors:  L Miller; Q Dai; A Vegesna; A Korimilli; R Ulerich; B Schiffner; J Brassuer
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 8.  The effect of surgery on pressure and motility.

Authors:  N J Soper
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  1999 Mar-Jun
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.