Literature DB >> 7626794

Re-programming of expression of the KGFR and bek variants of fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 during limb regeneration in newts (Notophthalmus viridescens).

M L Poulin1, I M Chiu.   

Abstract

We have previously shown, by in situ hybridization, that fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) is present in the basal layer of wound epithelium during limb regeneration in newts (Notophthalmus viridescens). In contrast, FGFR1 expression is observed throughout the blastema mesenchyme but is distinctly absent from the wound epithelium (Poulin et al. [1993] Development 119:353-361). Sequence analysis revealed that we have isolated both the KGFR and bek variants of FGFR2. These two variants differ only in the second half of the last of their three (or two) Ig-like domains. In this report, we show the expression patterns of FGFR2 variants during limb regeneration by in situ hybridization. During the pre-blastema stages of regeneration, FGFR2 expression was observed in the basal layer of the wound epithelium and in the cells of the periosteum. The wound epithelial hybridization was observed when the KGFR-specific probe was used while the bek-specific probe hybridized to mRNA in the cells of the periosteum. As regeneration progresses to the blastema stages, KGFR expression continued to be observed in the basal layer of the wound epithelium with additional hybridization seen in the blastema mesenchyme closely associated with the bisected bones. The bek-specific hybridization pattern observed at this stage corresponds specifically to the mesenchymal hybridization. In the differentiation stages of regeneration, the mesenchymal expression of FGFR2 becomes restricted to the cells of the condensing cartilage and later to the perichondrium. Interestingly, there appears to be a dorsoventral gradient of the expression of both KGFR and bek variants of FGFR2, which are opposite each other at the later stages of regeneration. Thus, re-programming of expression of the two FGFR2 variants is required during the initial wound closure of limb regeneration. Remarkably, the expression patterns of KGFR and bek mimic those observed in the mouse limb bud during early embryonic development (Orr-Urtreger et al. [1993] Dev. Biol. 18:475-486). Moreover, our results suggest that the two FGFR2 variants have distinct roles in limb regeneration. Further investigation regarding the potential sources of the FGF ligands will help establish the roles that FGFs and FGFRs play in limb regeneration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7626794     DOI: 10.1002/aja.1002020407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Dyn        ISSN: 1058-8388            Impact factor:   3.780


  6 in total

1.  Expression of FGF2 in the limb blastema of two Salamandridae correlates with their regenerative capability.

Authors:  S Giampaoli; S Bucci; M Ragghianti; G Mancino; F Zhang; P Ferretti
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Mechanisms of urodele limb regeneration.

Authors:  David L Stocum
Journal:  Regeneration (Oxf)       Date:  2017-12-26

3.  Conservation of fibroblast growth factor function in lens regeneration.

Authors:  K Del Rio-Tsonis; J C Jung; I M Chiu; P A Tsonis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Canonical Wnt signaling and the regulation of divergent mesenchymal Fgf8 expression in axolotl limb development and regeneration.

Authors:  Giacomo L Glotzer; Pietro Tardivo; Elly M Tanaka
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 8.713

5.  Accelerated wound closure in vitro by fibroblasts from a subgroup of cleft lip/palate patients: role of transforming growth factor-α.

Authors:  Joël Beyeler; Isabelle Schnyder; Christos Katsaros; Matthias Chiquet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  De novo transcriptome sequencing of axolotl blastema for identification of differentially expressed genes during limb regeneration.

Authors:  Cheng-Han Wu; Mong-Hsun Tsai; Chia-Chuan Ho; Chien-Yu Chen; Hsuan-Shu Lee
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.969

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.