Literature DB >> 7626679

The effects of partial decriminalisation on cannabis use in South Australia, 1985 to 1993.

N Donnelly1, W Hall, P Christie.   

Abstract

In 1987 the Cannabis Expiration Notice scheme decreased penalties for the personal use of cannabis in South Australia. Data from four National Campaign Against Drug Abuse (NCADA) household drug-use surveys covering the period 1985 to 1993 were analysed to measure the effect of the decriminalisation on cannabis use. The main outcomes used were the self-reported prevalence rates of having ever used cannabis and current weekly use. Logistic regression was used to control for the potentially confounding effects of age and sex. Other outcomes were rates of having ever been offered cannabis and willingness to use cannabis if offered it. Between 1985 and 1993 the adjusted prevalence rate of ever having used cannabis increased in South Australia from 26 per cent to 38 per cent. There were also significant increases in Victoria and Tasmania, and to a lesser extent in New South Wales. The increase in South Australia was not significantly greater than the average increase (P = 0.1). Adjusted rates of weekly use increased between 1988 and 1991 in South Australia, but did not change through 1993. Although the effect was in the direction of a greater increase in South Australia, this was not statistically significant when compared to increases in the rest of Australia (P = 0.07). The greatest increase in adjusted weekly use occurred in Tasmania between 1991 and 1993, from 2 per cent to 7 per cent. Although the NCADA survey data indicate that there were increases in cannabis use in South Australia in 1985-1993, they cannot be attributed to the effects of partial decriminalisation, because similar increases occurred in other states.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7626679     DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.1995.tb00444.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust J Public Health        ISSN: 1035-7319


  8 in total

Review 1.  Improving the quality of the cannabis debate: defining the different domains.

Authors:  J Strang; J Witton; W Hall
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-01-08

2.  The cannabis policy debate: finding a way forward.

Authors:  W Hall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-06-13       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Cannabis decriminalization: A study of recent policy change in five U.S. states.

Authors:  Richard A Grucza; Mike Vuolo; Melissa J Krauss; Andrew D Plunk; Arpana Agrawal; Frank J Chaloupka; Laura J Bierut
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2018-07-17

4.  Two-part random effects growth modeling to identify risks associated with alcohol and cannabis initiation, initial average use and changes in drug consumption in a sample of adult, male twins.

Authors:  Nathan A Gillespie; Gitta H Lubke; Charles O Gardner; Michael C Neale; Kenneth S Kendler
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 4.492

5.  A retrospective analysis of cannabis use in a cohort of mentally ill patients in Sri Lanka and its implications on policy development.

Authors:  Chaturaka Rodrigo; Srina Welgama; Alwis Gunawardana; Chinthaka Maithripala; Gamini Jayananda; Senaka Rajapakse
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2010-07-08

6.  Pathways to cannabis abuse: a multi-stage model from cannabis availability, cannabis initiation and progression to abuse.

Authors:  Nathan A Gillespie; Michael C Neale; Kenneth S Kendler
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 6.526

7.  Cannabis decriminalization and racial disparity in arrests for cannabis possession.

Authors:  Christian Gunadi; Yuyan Shi
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Impact evaluations of drug decriminalisation and legal regulation on drug use, health and social harms: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ayden I Scheim; Nazlee Maghsoudi; Zack Marshall; Siobhan Churchill; Carolyn Ziegler; Dan Werb
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.