Literature DB >> 7626278

EP component identification and measurement by principal components analysis.

R M Chapman1, J W McCrary.   

Abstract

Between the acquisition of Evoked Potential (EP) data and their interpretation lies a major problem: What to measure? An approach to this kind of problem is outlined here in terms of Principal Components Analysis (PCA). An important second theme is that experimental manipulation is important to functional interpretation. It would be desirable to have a system of EP measurement with the following characteristics: (1) represent the data in a concise, parsimonous way; (2) determine EP components from the data without assuming in advance any particular waveforms for the components; (3) extract components which are independent of each other; (4) measure the amounts (contributions) of various components in observed EPs; (5) use measures that have greater reliability than measures at any single time point or peak; and (6) identify and measure components that overlap in time. PCA has these desirable characteristics. Simulations are illustrated. PCA's beauty also has some warts that are discussed. In addition to discussing the usual two-mode model of PCA, an extension of PCA to a three-mode model is described that provides separate parameters for (1) waveforms over time, (2) coefficients for spatial distribution, and (3) scores telling the amount of each component in each EP. PCA is compared with more traditional approaches. Some biophysical considerations are briefly discussed. Choices to be made in applying PCA are considered. Other issues include misallocation of variance, overlapping components, validation, and latency changes.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7626278     DOI: 10.1006/brcg.1995.1024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  47 in total

1.  Trial-to-trial variability and state-dependent modulation of auditory-evoked responses in cortex.

Authors:  M A Kisley; G L Gerstein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Functionally independent components of the late positive event-related potential during visual spatial attention.

Authors:  S Makeig; M Westerfield; T P Jung; J Covington; J Townsend; T J Sejnowski; E Courchesne
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The time course of brain activity in reading English and Chinese: an ERP study of Chinese bilinguals.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Charles A Perfetti
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Neuronal generator patterns of olfactory event-related brain potentials in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Jürgen Kayser; Craig E Tenke; Dolores Malaspina; Christopher J Kroppmann; Jennifer D Schaller; Andrew Deptula; Nathan A Gates; Jill M Harkavy-Friedman; Roberto Gil; Gerard E Bruder
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Automatic attention to emotional stimuli: neural correlates.

Authors:  Luis Carretié; José A Hinojosa; Manuel Martín-Loeches; Francisco Mercado; Manuel Tapia
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Exogenous attention to facial vs non-facial emotional visual stimuli.

Authors:  Luis Carretié; Dominique Kessel; Alejandra Carboni; Sara López-Martín; Jacobo Albert; Manuel Tapia; Francisco Mercado; Almudena Capilla; José A Hinojosa
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Predicting conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease using neuropsychological tests and multivariate methods.

Authors:  Robert M Chapman; Mark Mapstone; John W McCrary; Margaret N Gardner; Anton Porsteinsson; Tiffany C Sandoval; Maria D Guillily; Elizabeth Degrush; Lindsey A Reilly
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 2.475

8.  Neural response to sustained affective visual stimulation using an indirect task.

Authors:  Luis Carretié; José A Hinojosa; Jacobo Albert; Francisco Mercado
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Psychopathy, attention, and oddball target detection: New insights from PCL-R facet scores.

Authors:  Nathaniel E Anderson; Vaughn R Steele; J Michael Maurer; Edward M Bernat; Kent A Kiehl
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Brain ERP components predict which individuals progress to Alzheimer's disease and which do not.

Authors:  Robert M Chapman; John W McCrary; Margaret N Gardner; Tiffany C Sandoval; Maria D Guillily; Lindsey A Reilly; Elizabeth DeGrush
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 4.673

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.