Literature DB >> 7626234

Human small intestinal sucrase-isomaltase: different binding patterns for malto- and isomaltooligosaccharides.

H Heymann1, D Breitmeier, S Günther.   

Abstract

The hydrolysis of maltose and isomaltose and of sucrose and isomaltose at two different catalytic sites of sucrase-isomaltase has been demonstrated. Maltose and sucrose are competing for the same catalytic center. This competing can be described by alternative substrate kinetics. Steady-state kinetic parameters Km and k0 (maximal reaction velocity per mol enzyme) for linear alpha-1,4 and alpha-1,6 glucosyloligosaccharides has been determined. Using these parameters subsite affinities for the catalytic sites of sucrase and isomaltase were computed. The different numbers of subsites for sucrase (2 subsites) and isomaltase (4 subsites) indicate, that the binding patterns for maltooligosaccharides and isomaltooligosaccharides are different. That means that for sucrase unproductive enzyme-maltooligosaccharide complexes are definitely less probable than the productive one. As in human small intestinal glucoamylase-maltase in the isomaltase moiety four subsites can be evaluated with affinity values (Ai): A1 = 2.6 (+/- 0.91), A2 = 13.8 (+/- 0.70), A3 = 1.1 (+/- 0.13) and A4 = 1.5 (+/- 0.13) kJ/mol using isomaltooligosaccharides. The two subsites of sucrase are evaluated to be A1 = 4.9 (+/- 0.70) and A2 = 16.7 (+/- 0.51) kJ/mol using maltooligosaccharides. The four subsite model for isomaltase and glucoamylase-maltase is an indication that these two enzymes are mechanistically homologous in binding linear glucosyl-oligosaccharides.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7626234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Chem Hoppe Seyler        ISSN: 0177-3593


  6 in total

1.  Structural basis for substrate selectivity in human maltase-glucoamylase and sucrase-isomaltase N-terminal domains.

Authors:  Lyann Sim; Carly Willemsma; Sankar Mohan; Hassan Y Naim; B Mario Pinto; David R Rose
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Structural insight into substrate specificity of human intestinal maltase-glucoamylase.

Authors:  Limei Ren; Xiaohong Qin; Xiaofang Cao; Lele Wang; Fang Bai; Gang Bai; Yuequan Shen
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 14.870

3.  Modulation of starch digestion for slow glucose release through "toggling" of activities of mucosal α-glucosidases.

Authors:  Byung-Hoo Lee; Razieh Eskandari; Kyra Jones; Kongara Ravinder Reddy; Roberto Quezada-Calvillo; Buford L Nichols; David R Rose; Bruce R Hamaker; B Mario Pinto
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Enzyme-synthesized highly branched maltodextrins have slow glucose generation at the mucosal α-glucosidase level and are slowly digestible in vivo.

Authors:  Byung-Hoo Lee; Like Yan; Robert J Phillips; Bradley L Reuhs; Kyra Jones; David R Rose; Buford L Nichols; Roberto Quezada-Calvillo; Sang-Ho Yoo; Bruce R Hamaker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Unexpected high digestion rate of cooked starch by the Ct-maltase-glucoamylase small intestine mucosal α-glucosidase subunit.

Authors:  Amy Hui-Mei Lin; Buford L Nichols; Roberto Quezada-Calvillo; Stephen E Avery; Lyann Sim; David R Rose; Hassan Y Naim; Bruce R Hamaker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Different sucrose-isomaltase response of Caco-2 cells to glucose and maltose suggests dietary maltose sensing.

Authors:  Min-Wen Cheng; Mohammad Chegeni; Kee-Hong Kim; Genyi Zhang; Mustapha Benmoussa; Roberto Quezada-Calvillo; Buford L Nichols; Bruce R Hamaker
Journal:  J Clin Biochem Nutr       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.114

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.