Literature DB >> 7625806

In vitro activity of roxithromycin against the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex.

N Rastogi1, K S Goh, P Ruiz, M Casal.   

Abstract

Roxithromycin has recently been shown to possess significant in vitro activity against a variety of atypical mycobacteria such as the M. avium complex, M. scrofulaceum, M. szulgai, M. malmoense, M. xenopi, M. marinum, and M. kansasii and rare pathogens like M. chelonei and M. fortuitum. In the present investigation, screening of its in vitro activity was further extended by testing it against 34 strains belonging to the M. tuberculosis complex (including M. tuberculosis, M. africanum, M. bovis, and M. bovis BCG). The MICs were determined by the radiometric BACTEC 460-TB methodology at pHs of both 6.8 and 7.4, as well as with 7H10 agar medium by the 1% proportion method. With the exception of M. bovis BCG (MIC ranges, 0.5 to 4 micrograms/ml at pH 6.8 and 0.25 to 2 micrograms/ml at pH 7.4), MICs for all of the isolates were significantly greater (MIC ranges, 32 to > 64 micrograms/ml at pH 6.8 and 16 to > 32 micrograms/ml at pH 7.4) than those reported previously for atypical mycobacteria. Roxithromycin MICs of 64 or > 64 micrograms/ml for all of the M. tuberculosis isolates screened were found by the 7H10 agar medium method. Roxithromycin, however, showed a pH-dependent bactericidal effect against M. tuberculosis because the drug was relatively more active when it was used at pH 7.4 than when it was used at pH 6.8. We conclude that roxithromycin per se is not a drug of choice for the treatment of M. tuberculosis infection or disease; however, considering its pharmacokinetics, eventual anti-tubercle bacillus activity in an in vivo system cannot yet be excluded. We suggest that the use of roxithromycin in chemoprophylactic regimens for the prevention of opportunistic infections (including M. avium complex infections) in patients with AIDS should be carefully monitored, and patients should be enrolled in such a regimen only after it has been excluded that the patient das an underlying infection of disease caused by M. tuberculosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7625806      PMCID: PMC162701          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.39.5.1162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  17 in total

1.  Promising new drugs in the treatment of tuberculosis and mycobacteriosis.

Authors:  M Casal; F Rodríguez; J Gutierrez; P Ruiz; M C Benavente; R Villalba; G Moreno
Journal:  J Chemother       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.714

Review 2.  Macrolides and host defences to respiratory tract pathogens.

Authors:  C G Gemmell
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Activities of amikacin, roxithromycin, and azithromycin alone or in combination with tumor necrosis factor against Mycobacterium avium complex.

Authors:  L E Bermudez; L S Young
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Drug susceptibility testing in tuberculosis: a comparison of the proportion methods using Lowenstein-Jensen, Middlebrook 7H10 and 7H11 agar media and a radiometric method.

Authors:  N Rastogi; K S Goh; H L David
Journal:  Res Microbiol       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.992

5.  Activities of roxithromycin used alone and in combination with ethambutol, rifampin, amikacin, ofloxacin, and clofazimine against Mycobacterium avium complex.

Authors:  N Rastogi; K S Goh; A Bryskier
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Clarithromycin minimal inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations against Mycobacterium avium.

Authors:  L B Heifets; P J Lindholm-Levy; R D Comstock
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1992-04

7.  Evidence that vesicles containing living, virulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis or Mycobacterium avium in cultured human macrophages are not acidic.

Authors:  A J Crowle; R Dahl; E Ross; M H May
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 8.  New directions for macrolide antibiotics: pharmacokinetics and clinical efficacy.

Authors:  H A Kirst; G D Sides
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Interlaboratory drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by a radiometric procedure and two conventional methods.

Authors:  S H Siddiqi; J E Hawkins; A Laszlo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  [In vitro sensitivity of Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium xenopi to erythromycin, roxithromycin and doxycycline].

Authors:  J Maugein; J Fourche; M Mormede; J L Pellegrin
Journal:  Pathol Biol (Paris)       Date:  1989-06
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetic factors in the modern drug treatment of tuberculosis.

Authors:  J G Douglas; M J McLeod
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  In vitro activities of levofloxacin used alone and in combination with first- and second-line antituberculous drugs against Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  N Rastogi; K S Goh; A Bryskier; A Devallois
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Ribonucleotide reduction in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: function and expression of genes encoding class Ib and class II ribonucleotide reductases.

Authors:  Stephanie S Dawes; Digby F Warner; Liana Tsenova; Juliano Timm; John D McKinney; Gilla Kaplan; Harvey Rubin; Valerie Mizrahi
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.441

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.