Literature DB >> 7625509

The estimated frequency of cosmetic breast augmentation among US women, 1963 through 1988.

M B Terry1, M L Skovron, S Garbers, E Sonnenschein, P Toniolo.   

Abstract

Estimates ranging from 1 to 2 million have been used to describe the number of women in the United States who have had cosmetic breast implants. Original data from a historical cohort study of women with breast augmentation were combined with simulation techniques to compute new estimates grounded on a more objective set of information and assumptions than previous attempts. It was estimated that the number of women who had cosmetic augmentation mammoplasty between 1963 and 1988 was 894,206 (range = 437,602 to 2,035,783). The number of women ever treated with cosmetic augmentation mammoplasty may be substantially smaller than previously reported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7625509      PMCID: PMC1615801          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.85.8_pt_1.1122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  9 in total

1.  National survey of self-reported breast implants: 1988 estimates.

Authors:  R A Bright; L L Jeng; R M Moore
Journal:  J Long Term Eff Med Implants       Date:  1993

2.  Breast implants--protection or paternalism?

Authors:  M Angell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-06-18       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The basis of the FDA's decision on breast implants.

Authors:  D A Kessler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-06-18       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Breast augmentation: a risk factor for breast cancer?

Authors:  H Berkel; D C Birdsell; H Jenkins
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-06-18       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Augmentation mammaplasty and breast cancer: a 5-year update of the Los Angeles study.

Authors:  D M Deapen; G S Brody
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Risk of connective-tissue diseases and other disorders after breast implantation.

Authors:  S E Gabriel; W M O'Fallon; L T Kurland; C M Beard; J E Woods; L J Melton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-06-16       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Silicone controversy: a survey of women with breast cancer and silicone implants.

Authors:  E P Winer; K Fee-Fulkerson; C C Fulkerson; G Georgiade; K E Catoe; M Conaway; C Brunatti; V Holmes; B K Rimer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-09-01       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Cancer in the augmented breast. Diagnosis and prognosis.

Authors:  C P Clark; G N Peters; K M O'Brien
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  The relationship between breast cancer and augmentation mammaplasty: an epidemiologic study.

Authors:  D M Deapen; M C Pike; J T Casagrande; G S Brody
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 4.730

  9 in total
  7 in total

1.  The socially constructed breast: breast implants and the medical construction of need.

Authors:  N Jacobson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Estimating the prevalence of women with breast implants.

Authors:  R A Bright; R M Moore
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Breast augmentation: A geographical comparison.

Authors:  Janae L Maher; Della C Bennett; Laura L Bennett; Peter Grothaus; Raman C Mahabir
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2010

Review 4.  The effect of study design biases on the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for detecting silicone breast implant ruptures: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jae W Song; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Lillian T Bellfi; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 5.  Silicone breast implants: epidemiological evidence of sequelae.

Authors:  Z A Stein
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Silicone gel breast implant adverse event reports to the Food and Drug Administration, 1984-1995.

Authors:  S L Brown; C M Parmentier; E K Woo; R L Vishnuvajjala; M L Headrick
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  Halo and spillover effect illustrations for selected beneficial medical devices and drugs.

Authors:  Brent D Kerger; Autumn Bernal; Dennis J Paustenbach; Gavin Huntley-Fenner
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.295

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.