Literature DB >> 7625394

Changes concurrent with orthodontic treatment when maxillary expansion is a primary goal.

P T Ladner1, Z F Muhl.   

Abstract

A retrospective study of dental and maxillary skeletal changes occurring during a period of orthodontic treatment was made from pretreatment and posttreatment dental casts. Sixty maxillary expansion cases were examined. Thirty cases had maxillary expansion accomplished with a fixed rapid palatal expander and 30 were expanded with a quadhelix appliance. All cases were finished with full fixed edgewise appliances. Multiple linear regression analyses were completed for both groups with upper molar width change as the criterion and age, tipping of the upper molars, palatal width change and maxillary tipping as the predictors. All predictors were included in the analysis for the quadhelix group with a significant R2 value of 0.55. For the rapid expansion group, a significant R2 value of 0.33 was achieved with the inclusion of palatal width change and age only. The other variables did not meet the level of significance for entry into the model. Although both groups demonstrated similar amounts of maxillary dental expansion, the rapid expansion group demonstrated greater average skeletal expansion. In addition, there was a significant relationship between skeletal and dental expansion for the rapid expansion group, but not the quadhelix group. Palatal depth increased more on average in the rapid expansion group suggesting that there was greater dental eruption in that group. Expansion across the mandibular molars was greater on average in the quadhelix group. There was no difference in the degree of upper molar rotation or final upper and lower arch forms between the two groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7625394     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70082-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  7 in total

1.  Magical NiTi expander.

Authors:  Chandrika Girish Katti; Girish Katti; Ravi Kallur; Srinivas Rao Ghali
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-07-17

2.  Comparison of a modified RME appliance with other appliances for transverse maxillary expansion.

Authors:  Catharina Weyrich; Michael Noss; Jörg A Lisson
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of changes in the naso-maxillary complex associated with two types of maxillary expanders.

Authors:  Valmy Pangrazio-Kulbersh; Paul Wine; Mariana Haughey; Brynn Pajtas; Richard Kaczynski
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  A comparison of three-dimensional stress distribution and displacement of naso-maxillary complex on application of forces using quad-helix and nickel titanium palatal expander 2 (NPE2): a FEM study.

Authors:  Avinash Kumar; Hajra Ghafoor; Arifa Khanam
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.750

5.  Three-Dimensional Prospective Evaluation of Piezocision-Assisted and Conventional Rapid Maxillary Expansion: A Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Ahmed I Abdul-Aziz; Wael M Refai
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2019-01-05

6.  Evaluation of palate area before and after rapid maxillary expansion, using cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Carolina Bruder; Cristina Lucia Feijó Ortolani; Tatiana Araújo de Lima; Flavia Artese; Kurt Faltin Junior
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2019-11-11

7.  Maxillary Transverse Deficit: A Retrospective Study of Two Biologically Oriented Devices through a Digital Workflow.

Authors:  Graziano Montaruli; Simona Virgilio; Michele Laurenziello; Michele Tepedino; Domenico Ciavarella
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.