Literature DB >> 7623530

Randomised, double-blind comparison of reteplase double-bolus administration with streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction (INJECT): trial to investigate equivalence. International Joint Efficacy Comparison of Thrombolytics.

.   

Abstract

Streptokinase and alteplase are established therapies in acute myocardial infarction. Reteplase is a new thrombolytic agent that can be given as a double bolus. This trial was designed to determine whether the effect of reteplase on survival was at least equivalent (within 1% of fatality rate) to that of a standard streptokinase regimen. Patients from 208 centres in nine countries (n = 6010) with symptoms and electrocardiographic criteria consistent with acute myocardial infarction were randomised to receive double-blind either streptokinase 1.5 MU intravenously over 60 min or reteplase two boluses of 10 MU given 30 min apart. Treatment could be started up to 12 h from onset of symptoms. All patients received intravenous heparin for at least 24 h. The primary endpoint was 35-day outcome. There were 270 deaths (9.02%) in the reteplase and 285 deaths (9.53%) in the streptokinase group, a non-significant difference (95% CI -1.98% to 0.96%). Among patients who received treatment (98.8%) there were 263 deaths (8.90%) in the reteplase compared with 279 deaths (9.43%) in the streptokinase group (a difference of -0.53%). Because the upper limit of the 90% CI for this difference is 0.71%, this result shows that reteplase is at least as effective as streptokinase. In-hospital stroke rates were 1.23% for reteplase and 1.00% for streptokinase. Bleeding events were similar in the two treatment groups (0.7% reteplase, 1.0% streptokinase). The incidence of recurrent myocardial infarction was similar, but there were significantly fewer cases of atrial fibrillation, asystole, cardiac shock, heart failure, and hypotension in the reteplase group. We conclude that reteplase is an effective drug in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. It is clinically safe, its administration is simple, and it will be a useful addition to the range of thrombolytic agents available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7623530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  37 in total

Review 1.  New thrombolytics, anticoagulants, and platelet antagonists: the future of clinical practice.

Authors:  R C Becker
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 2.  Advances in the medical management of acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  C P Cannon
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 3.  Emergency management of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  S Maxwell
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  Thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  U Priglinger; K Huber
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 5.  Current clinical use of reteplase for thrombolysis. A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic perspective.

Authors:  U Martin; B Kaufmann; G Neugebauer
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Efficacy, safety and cost of new cardiovascular drugs: a survey.

Authors:  Silvio Garattini; Vittorio Bertele'
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Impact of type of thrombolytic agent on in-hospital outcomes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients in the Middle East.

Authors:  Ibrahim Al-Zakwani; Amr Ali; Mohammad Zubaid; Prashanth Panduranga; Kadhim Sulaiman; Ahmed Abusham; Wael Almahmeed; Ahmed Al-Motarreb; Jassim Al Suwaidi; Haitham Amin
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 8.  Drug Treatment of STEMI in the Elderly: Focus on Fibrinolytic Therapy and Insights from the STREAM Trial.

Authors:  Peter R Sinnaeve; Thierry Danays; Kris Bogaerts; Frans Van de Werf; Paul W Armstrong
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.923

9.  Coronary Artery Patency and Survival in Clinical Trials.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 10.  Disappointing biotech.

Authors:  Roberta Joppi; Vittorio Bertele'; Silvio Garattini
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-10-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.