Literature DB >> 7622815

Clinical utility of venlafaxine in comparison with other antidepressants.

Y Lecrubier1.   

Abstract

The newer antidepressants have clearly shown themselves to be safer and to have a more acceptable side effect profile than the traditional antidepressants. Greater patient acceptability has important consequences in relation to efficacy, in that compliance is likely to be better in the long term. One of the newest antidepressants, the serotonin- noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor venlafaxine, has neurobiologic properties that recommend it for clinical use by both the psychiatrist and the general practitioner. Controlled studies have confirmed the overall utility of this agent in treating a range of depressive subtypes, such as moderate depression and severe endogenous depression, with a low risk of serious adverse events and an excellent tolerability profile. In addition, venlafaxine has shown a dose-response relationship for efficacy, offering the possibility of a wide dose range, which may be suitably employed in different clinical situations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7622815     DOI: 10.1097/00004850-199503002-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 0268-1315            Impact factor:   1.659


  3 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling of venlafaxine: pupillary light reflex as a test system for noradrenergic effects.

Authors:  Andreas Lindauer; Timo Siepmann; Reinhard Oertel; Angelika Jung; Tjalf Ziemssen; Ulrich Jaehde; Wilhelm Kirch; Martin Siepmann
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Distribution and excretion of venlafaxine and O-desmethylvenlafaxine in human milk.

Authors:  K F Ilett; L P Hackett; L J Dusci; M J Roberts; J H Kristensen; M Paech; A Groves; P Yapp
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  The Pharmacogenomics of Bipolar Disorder study (PGBD): identification of genes for lithium response in a prospective sample.

Authors:  Ketil J Oedegaard; Martin Alda; Anit Anand; Ole A Andreassen; Yokesh Balaraman; Wade H Berrettini; Abesh Bhattacharjee; Kristen J Brennand; Katherine E Burdick; Joseph R Calabrese; Cynthia V Calkin; Ana Claasen; William H Coryell; David Craig; Anna DeModena; Mark Frye; Fred H Gage; Keming Gao; Julie Garnham; Elliot Gershon; Petter Jakobsen; Susan G Leckband; Michael J McCarthy; Melvin G McInnis; Adam X Maihofer; Jerome Mertens; Gunnar Morken; Caroline M Nievergelt; John Nurnberger; Son Pham; Helle Schoeyen; Tatyana Shekhtman; Paul D Shilling; Szabolcs Szelinger; Bruce Tarwater; Jun Yao; Peter P Zandi; John R Kelsoe
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.630

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.