Literature DB >> 7621766

Brain electrical source analysis of laser evoked potentials in response to painful trigeminal nerve stimulation.

B Bromm1, A C Chen.   

Abstract

Cerebral generators of long latency brain potentials in response to painful heat stimuli were identified from potential distributions in 31 EEG leads, using the brain electrical source analysis (BESA) programme in the multiple spatio-temporal dipole mode. Data were taken from a study with 10 young healthy male subjects who participated in 3 identical sessions, 1 week apart, with 4 blocks of 40 stimuli (randomized intensities above mean pain threshold). Brief infrared laser heat pulses were applied to the right temple; laser evoked brain potentials (LEPs) were averaged over 40 stimuli per block. BESA was applied to the grand mean maps averaged over the 10 subjects, 3 sessions and 4 stimulus blocks per session, as well as to the individual maps. In all cases 4 generators could consistently be identified by BESA, which were able to explain up to 98.8% of the total variance in scalp distributions at certain time intervals: dipole I with a maximum activity at 106.3 msec in the contralateral somatosensory trigeminal cortex, 19.0 mm beneath the surface; dipole II with a maximum activity at 112.1 msec at the corresponding ipsilateral area at a depth of 13.6 mm; dipole III with a maximum activity at 130.4 msec in the frontal cortex; dipole IV with 2 relative maximum activities at 150.6 and 220.5 msec, localized centrally under the vertex at a depth of 33.1 mm, which described both the late vertex negativity and the consecutive positivity. BESA applied to the individual LEP maps of each individual and session yielded again 4 major generators with sites, strengths and orientations comparable to those of the grand mean evaluations. The standard deviation (S.D.) of site coordinates within subjects was less than 3 mm for dipoles I, II and IV (5 mm for dipole III). The between-subject standard deviation was considerably larger (15 mm), which was attributed to individual differences in head geometry, size and anatomy. Dipoles I and II are assumed to be generators in secondary somatosensory areas of the trigeminal nerve system with bilateral representation, though significantly stronger in the contralateral site. Dipole III in the frontal cortex may be related to attention and arousal processes, as well as to motor cortical initiation for eye movements and muscle effects. The central dipole IV describing all late activity between 150 and 220 msec is probably a representative of perceptual activation and cognitive information processing; it was located in deep midline brain structure, e.g., the cingular gyrus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7621766     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(95)00032-t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  16 in total

1.  Excitability of the Adelta nociceptive pathways as assessed by the recovery cycle of laser evoked potentials in humans.

Authors:  A Truini; P Rossi; F Galeotti; A Romaniello; M Virtuoso; C De Lena; M Leandri; G Cruccu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-01-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Dynamic processing of nociception in cortical network in conscious rats: a laser-evoked field potential study.

Authors:  Zhi-Mei Qiao; Jin-Yan Wang; Ji-Sheng Han; Fei Luo
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2007-10-06       Impact factor: 5.046

3.  Spectral and spatial changes of brain rhythmic activity in response to the sustained thermal pain stimulation.

Authors:  Clara Huishi Zhang; Abbas Sohrabpour; Yunfeng Lu; Bin He
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Quantifying and Characterizing Tonic Thermal Pain Across Subjects From EEG Data Using Random Forest Models.

Authors:  Vishal Vijayakumar; Michelle Case; Sina Shirinpour; Bin He
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 5.  [Clinical application of pain-related evoked potentials].

Authors:  N Hansen; M Obermann; N Uçeyler; D Zeller; D Mueller; M S Yoon; K Reiners; C Sommer; Z Katsarava
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.107

6.  Evidence-based source modeling of nociceptive cortical responses: A direct comparison of scalp and intracranial activity in humans.

Authors:  Claire Bradley; Hélène Bastuji; Luis Garcia-Larrea
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 7.  Brodmann area 10: Collating, integrating and high level processing of nociception and pain.

Authors:  Ke Peng; Sarah C Steele; Lino Becerra; David Borsook
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 11.685

8.  Emotional modulation of pain-related evoked potentials.

Authors:  Christopher Ring; Maria Kavussanu; Adrian R Willoughby
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 3.251

9.  Duration of the cue-to-pain delay increases pain intensity: a combined EEG and MEG study.

Authors:  Michael Hauck; Jürgen Lorenz; Roger Zimmermann; Stefan Debener; Eckehard Scharein; Andreas K Engel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 2.064

10.  A transition from unimodal to multimodal activations in four sensory modalities in humans: an electrophysiological study.

Authors:  Emi Tanaka; Koji Inui; Tetsuo Kida; Takahiro Miyazaki; Yasuyuki Takeshima; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.