Literature DB >> 7621685

A multicentred phase III comparative clinical trial of Mesigyna, Cyclofem and Injectable No. 1 given monthly by intramuscular injection to Chinese women. I. Contraceptive efficacy and sid effects.

G W Sang1, Q X Shao, R S Ge, J L Ge, J K Chen, S Song, K J Fang, M L He, S Y Luo, S F Chen.   

Abstract

A phase III clinical study was carried out among 5680 fertile Chinese women to evaluate efficacy and side effects of three monthly injectable contraceptives: Mesigyna, Cyclofem and Chinese Injectable No. 1. When used in a once-a-month treatment schedule (part 1 of study), the effectiveness of Chinese Injectable No. 1 was unacceptably low; 36 pregnancies occurred during the first 1743 women-months of use, 16 before the second injection. The study was restarted with a revised injection schedule for Injectable No. 1: two injections separated by 9 +/- 1 days during the first month and subsequent injections given 10-12 days after the onset of bleeding, or if no bleeding occurred, 28 days after previous injection. In part 2 of the study, 988, 990 and 992 subjects were provided Mesigyna, Cyclofem and Injectable No. 1, respectively. Life-table pregnancy rates at one year were 0.41%, 0% and 0.77% (p < 0.05), respectively; the overall discontinuation rates at one year were 13.9%, 19.1% and 20.4% (p < 0.001). Discontinuation rates for bleeding problems were significantly different between the groups: discontinuation rates for amenorrhea were 0.58%, 3.71% and 0.68% (p < 0.001) for Mesigyna, Cyclofem and Injectable No. 1; for other bleeding problems, the rates were 4.88%, 8.38% and 12.64% (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding discontinuation for other medical or non-medical reasons. Mean weight changes after one year of use were small: 0.73, 0.86 and 0.17 kg for the three groups, respectively. Both Mesigyna and Cyclofem were very effective for contraception, but Mesigyna appeared to be tolerated slightly better with regard to cycle control; the modified dose regimen for Injectable No. 1 also gave a low pregnancy rate but was associated with higher rates of discontinuation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7621685     DOI: 10.1016/0010-7824(95)00013-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  3 in total

Review 1.  Family Planning Practices, Programmes and Policies in India Including Implants and Injectables with a Special Focus on Jharkhand, India: A Brief Review.

Authors:  Janmejaya Samal; Ranjit Kumar Dehury
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-11-01

Review 2.  Combination injectable contraceptives for contraception.

Authors:  Maria F Gallo; David A Grimes; Laureen M Lopez; Kenneth F Schulz; Catherine d'Arcangues
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-10-08

3.  Comparison of Two Different Injectable Contraceptive Methods: Depo-medroxy Progesterone Acetate (DMPA) and Cyclofem.

Authors:  Firoozeh Veisi; Maryam Zangeneh
Journal:  J Family Reprod Health       Date:  2013-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.