Literature DB >> 7621522

Immunocytochemical, electrophoresis, and immunoblot analysis of Heliothis virescens gap junctions isolated in the presence and absence of protease inhibitors.

J S Ryerse1.   

Abstract

Gap junction-enriched fractions were prepared from larvae of the tobacco budworm Heliothis virescens using the NaOH procedure in the presence or absence of protease inhibitors and were analyzed by SDS-PAGE immunoblotting and EM immunocytochemistry. Protease inhibitor fractions contained a 48-kDa protein in addition to the approximately 10 proteins in fractions with and without inhibitors. Three polyclonal antibodies were used as probes for gap junction plaques and proteins: R16, against an approximately 40-kDa candidate gap junction protein from Drosophila melanogaster; R17, against the 40-kDa candidate gap junction protein from H. virescens; and R18AP, an affinity purified antibody against a consensus sequence of N-terminal amino acids 2-21 of the H. virescens 40-kDa protein. R16, R17, and R18AP stain the 40- and 48-kDa proteins, R16 and R18AP stain a 64-kDa protein, and R16 stains an approximately 30-kDa protein in the absence of inhibitors. Inclusion of protease inhibitors had no effect on gap junction ultrastructure. R16 and R17 label gap junction plaques in crude membrane and NaOH fractions, whereas R18AP exhibits only a low level of reactivity with gap junctions in crude membrane fractions and none with gap junctions in NaOH fractions. The results show that the 30-, 40-, 48- and 64-kDa proteins are immunologically related and are associated with gap junctions in H. virescens, the N-terminus of the 40-kDa protein is relatively inaccessible or easily lost, and the 48-kDa protein is protease-sensitive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7621522     DOI: 10.1007/bf00307972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Tissue Res        ISSN: 0302-766X            Impact factor:   5.249


  17 in total

1.  Three-dimensional structure of an invertebrate intercellular communicating junction.

Authors:  S S Sikerwar; K H Downing; R M Glaeser
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 2.867

2.  Gap-junction quantification in biological tissues: freeze-fracture replicas versus thin sections.

Authors:  J S Ryerse; B A Nagel
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 1.758

Review 3.  The gap junction family: structure, function and chemistry.

Authors:  R Dermietzel; T K Hwang; D S Spray
Journal:  Anat Embryol (Berl)       Date:  1990

Review 4.  The role of gap junctions in development.

Authors:  S Caveney
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 19.318

Review 5.  Gap junctions and cell-cell communication.

Authors:  C MacDonald
Journal:  Essays Biochem       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 8.000

6.  Proteolysis of cardiac gap junctions during their isolation from rat hearts.

Authors:  C K Manjunath; G E Goings; E Page
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.843

7.  Isolation and characterization of gap junctions from Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J S Ryerse
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 5.249

8.  Biochemical and immunochemical analysis of the arrangement of connexin43 in rat heart gap junction membranes.

Authors:  D W Laird; J P Revel
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 5.285

9.  Preparation, characterization, and localization of antisera against bovine MP26, an integral protein from lens fiber plasma membrane.

Authors:  D L Paul; D A Goodenough
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Topological distribution of two connexin32 antigenic sites in intact and split rodent hepatocyte gap junctions.

Authors:  D A Goodenough; D L Paul; L Jesaitis
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 10.539

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.