Literature DB >> 7619250

The development of the Maternal Breastfeeding Evaluation Scale.

E W Leff, S C Jefferis, M P Gagne.   

Abstract

A Maternal Breastfeeding Evaluation Scale was developed from categories identified in qualitative research. Content validity was tested according to procedures described by Imle and Atwood and Lynn. A sample of 442 women who had breastfed completed an instrument of 56 Likert-scale items. A retest questionnaire was completed by a subsample of 28 women. Exploratory factor analysis resulted in three factors, accounting for 38.5 percent of the variance: Maternal Enjoyment/Role Attainment (29 percent), Infant Satisfaction/Growth (5 percent), and Lifestyle/Maternal Body Image (4 percent). A revised 30-item MBFES was developed using items loading strongly on these three factors. Cronbach's alphas for the revised scale and subscales were .93, .93, .88, and .80, respectively. Test-retest correlations (n = 28) were .93, .93, .94, and .82, respectively (p < .001 for all).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7619250     DOI: 10.1177/089033449401000217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Lact        ISSN: 0890-3344            Impact factor:   2.219


  29 in total

1.  A review of instruments used to predict early breastfeeding attrition.

Authors:  Lynne Porter Lewallen
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2006

2.  The effect of peer support on breast-feeding duration among primiparous women: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Cindy-Lee Dennis; Ellen Hodnett; Ruth Gallop; Beverley Chalmers
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-01-08       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Is baby-friendly breastfeeding support in maternity hospitals associated with breastfeeding satisfaction among Japanese mothers?

Authors:  Hiroko Hongo; Keiko Nanishi; Akira Shibanuma; Masamine Jimba
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-06

4.  Seeing other women breastfeed: how vicarious experience relates to breastfeeding intention and behaviour.

Authors:  Pat Hoddinott; Thilo Kroll; Amalraj Raja; Amanda Jane Lee
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  A Critical Review of Instruments Measuring Breastfeeding Attitudes, Knowledge, and Social Support.

Authors:  Corrine S Casal; Ann Lei; Sera L Young; Emily L Tuthill
Journal:  J Hum Lact       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 2.219

6.  Relationships between types of father breastfeeding support and breastfeeding outcomes.

Authors:  Lynn A Rempel; John K Rempel; Katrina C J Moore
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Randomised controlled trial of support from volunteer counsellors for mothers considering breast feeding.

Authors:  Jonathan Graffy; Jane Taylor; Anthony Williams; Sandra Eldridge
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-03

8.  Breastfeeding difficulties and supports and risk of postpartum depression in a cohort of womenwho have given birth in Calgary: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kathleen H Chaput; Alberto Nettel-Aguirre; Richard Musto; Carol E Adair; Suzanne C Tough
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2016-03-21

9.  Perceptions About Lactation Consultant Support, Breastfeeding Experiences and Postpartum Psychosocial Outcomes.

Authors:  Sarah A Keim; Jamie L Jackson; Jennifer L Litteral; Kyle A Schofield; Canice E Crerand
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2020-11-26

10.  Positive Emotions During Infant Feeding and Breastfeeding Outcomes.

Authors:  Kathryn Wouk; Christine Tucker; Brian W Pence; Samantha Meltzer-Brody; Bharathi Zvara; Karen Grewen; Alison M Stuebe
Journal:  J Hum Lact       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.219

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.