Literature DB >> 7618629

Relation between aortic dicrotic notch pressure and mean aortic pressure in adults.

J L Hébert1, Y Lecarpentier, K Zamani, C Coirault, G Daccache, D Chemla.   

Abstract

It has recently been suggested that mean arterial pressure provides a reliable estimate of dicrotic notch pressure in infants and children. The aim of the present study was twofold: (1) to investigate the relation existing between aortic dicrotic notch pressure and both the steady and pulsed component of aortic pressure in adults (i.e., mean and pulse aortic pressures, respectively); and (2) to evaluate mean aortic pressure as an estimate of aortic dicrotic notch pressure. High-fidelity pressure recordings were obtained at the aortic root level in 17 men (52 +/- 13 years). Pressure data were analyzed at rest over 10 consecutive beats in each patient, and, in 6 patients, during the Valsalva maneuver (over 22 to 50 consecutive beats). At rest, dicrotic notch pressure was greater than mean pressure (109.0 +/- 17.9 vs 99.6 +/- 12.5 mm Hg, p = 0.0001). Dicrotic notch pressure was positively related to mean pressure (r = 0.93) and to pulse pressure (r' = 0.77), but not to patient's heart rate, cardiac output, or total estimated arterial compliance. There was a spontaneous beat-to-beat relation between dicrotic notch and mean pressures (1) at rest in 16 of 17 patients (mean r = 0.85), and (2) in all patients undergoing the Valsalva maneuver (mean r = 0.97). During the maneuver, intravascular mean pressure ranged from 59 to 171 mm Hg. Dicrotic notch pressure was positively related to mean pressure (r = 0.98) and to pulse pressure (r' = 0.44). Both at rest and during the Valsalva maneuver, mean pressure underestimated dicrotic notch pressure, and the higher the dicrotic notch pressure, the more negative the percent error (each p = 0.0001). In conclusion, aortic dicrotic notch pressure was mainly related to the steady component of aortic pressure. The mean aortic pressure slightly but significantly underestimated aortic dicrotic notch pressure, and thus should be used with greater caution in adults than in young patients as an estimate of end-systolic pressure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7618629     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80086-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  8 in total

1.  Modulation of the host cell proteome by the intracellular apicomplexan parasite Toxoplasma gondii.

Authors:  M M Nelson; A R Jones; J C Carmen; A P Sinai; R Burchmore; J M Wastling
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  Concept and first experimental results of a new ferromagnetic assist device for extra-aortic counterpulsation.

Authors:  Christoph T Starck; Jakob Becker; Roland Fuhrer; Simon Sündermann; Jan Wendelin Stark; Volkmar Falk
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-09-22

3.  Predictors of mitral annulus early diastolic velocity: impact of long-axis function, ventricular filling pattern, and relaxation.

Authors:  Zoran B Popović; Milind Y Desai; Adisai Buakhamsri; Chirapa Puntawagkoon; Allen Borowski; Benjamin D Levine; Wilson W H Tang; James D Thomas
Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr       Date:  2011-08-23

4.  Beta-blockers in septic shock to optimize hemodynamics? We are not sure.

Authors:  Daniel De Backer; Djillali Annane
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Head-to-head comparison of indices of left ventricular contractile reserve assessed by high-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: five-year follow up.

Authors:  P Otasevic; Z B Popovic; J D Vasiljevic; L Pratali; A Vlahovic-Stipac; S D Boskovic; N Tasic; A N Neskovic
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Muscle-Powered Counterpulsation for Untethered, Non-Blood-Contacting Cardiac Support: A Path to Destination Therapy.

Authors:  Jooli Han; Edgar Aranda-Michel; Dennis R Trumble
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Suitable methods of measuring acceleration time in the diagnosis of internal carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Kentaro Iizuka; Hidehiro Takekawa; Akio Iwasaki; Haruki Igarashi; Keisuke Suzuki; Saro Kobayashi; Daisuke Tsukui; Koichi Hirata
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 8.  Photoplethysmogram Analysis and Applications: An Integrative Review.

Authors:  Junyung Park; Hyeon Seok Seok; Sang-Su Kim; Hangsik Shin
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.566

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.