Literature DB >> 7617861

Pancreatic duct: MR cholangiopancreatography with a three-dimensional fast spin-echo technique.

J A Soto1, M A Barish, E K Yucel, P Clarke, D Siegenberg, R Chuttani, J T Ferrucci.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the role of three-dimensional fast spin-echo magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of the normal and abnormal pancreatic duct.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A non-breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatographic technique with use of a body coil was compared with direct pancreatography performed with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in 37 patients.
RESULTS: MR cholangiopancreatograms of satisfactory quality were obtained in 92% of patients. Sensitivity for detection of pancreatic duct dilatation (n = 15) was 100% and 87% (observers 1 and 2, respectively). Among patients with pancreatic duct strictures (n = 8), 75% of the strictures were detected; there was a single false-positive finding. Specificity for both observers was 69% for the maximum intensity projection reconstructions and increased to 81% with review of the source images. Four of six cases of pancreas divisum (67%) and two cases of pancreatic duct stones were demonstrated. Interobserver agreement was moderate to substantial, as assessed with kappa-analysis.
CONCLUSION: MR cholangiopancreatography can accurately demonstrate the normal pancreatic duct as well as various pancreatic duct abnormalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7617861     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.196.2.7617861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  22 in total

Review 1.  Noninvasive imaging of the biliary ducts.

Authors:  J T Ferrucci
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the pancreas in 2001.

Authors:  Caroline Reinhold
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Idiopathic recurrent acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Luis F Lara; Michael J Levy
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2004-11-15

Review 4.  [Comparison of 2D and 3D sequences for MRCP. Clinical value of the different techniques].

Authors:  A M Wallnoefer; K A Herrmann; U Beuers; C J Zech; S Gourtsoyianni; M F Reiser; S O Schoenberg
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparison of respiratory-triggered three-dimensional fast-recovery fast spin-echo with parallel imaging technique and breath-hold half-Fourier two-dimensional single-shot fast spin-echo technique.

Authors:  Takayuki Masui; Motoyuki Katayama; Shigeru Kobayashi; Atsushi Nozaki; Masayoshi Sugimura; Mitsuru Ikeda; Harumi Sakahara
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2006-04

6.  Role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in diagnosing choledochal cysts: Case series and review.

Authors:  Vikas Y Sacher; James S Davis; Danny Sleeman; Javier Casillas
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2013-08-28

7.  The role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) after resection of the pancreas.

Authors:  H Ishizu; M Takahashi; Y Kondo; A Kataoka; T Nakamura; K Okada; H Masuko; Y Nishida; H Ogawa; R Yokoyama; Y Kimura
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 8.  Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  P W Bearcroft; D J Lomas
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  A prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected bile duct obstruction.

Authors:  H E Adamek; J Albert; M Weitz; H Breer; D Schilling; J F Riemann
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  The use of MRCP in the detection of pancreatic injuries after blunt trauma.

Authors:  Alfonso Ragozzino; Riccardo Manfredi; Mariano Scaglione; Rosaria De Ritis; Stefania Romano; Antonio Rotondo
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2003-03-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.