Literature DB >> 7617792

Computerized decision support systems in primary care.

R B Elson1, D P Connelly.   

Abstract

Computerized decision support can be passive or active. Passive decision support occurs when a computer facilitates access to relevant patient data or clinical knowledge for interpretation by the physician. Examples include CPR systems and reference texts or literature databases on CD-ROM. Effective passive decision support may ultimately prove to have a significant impact on physician decision making, but its potential to do so has been largely unexplored. Active decision support implies some higher level of information processing, or inference, by the computer. Examples include reminder / alert systems and diagnostic decision support systems. Inference processing in active decision support systems is generally rule-based, but probabilistic inference has been successfully used as well. Reminder systems have been consistently demonstrated to improve dramatically physician guideline compliance, generally by reducing oversight or error. The same potential for large-scale, systematic impact on physician decision-making by diagnostic decision support systems probably does not exist, but these systems may prove to be extremely useful in individual cases. Current applicability of diagnostic decision support systems to primary care is limited by the incompleteness and inaccuracies of the knowledge bases of these systems with respect to primary care. The applicability of computerized decision support in general to primary care is limited by more practical considerations. Widespread computerized decision support will not occur without CPR systems coupled with appropriate data standards and nomenclatures that will permit decision support tools to be accessed effortlessly during the routine process of patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7617792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prim Care        ISSN: 0095-4543            Impact factor:   2.907


  9 in total

1.  A design model for computer-based guideline implementation based on information management services.

Authors:  R N Shiffman; C A Brandt; Y Liaw; G J Corb
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  An industrial process view of information delivery to support clinical decision making: implications for systems design and process measures.

Authors:  R B Elson; J G Faughnan; D P Connelly
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Bridging the guideline implementation gap: a systematic, document-centered approach to guideline implementation.

Authors:  Richard N Shiffman; George Michel; Abdelwaheb Essaihi; Elizabeth Thornquist
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-06-07       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  The availability of unavailable information.

Authors:  M M Kuilboer; J van der Lei; A M Bohnen; J H van Bemmel
Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp       Date:  1997

5.  Effects of pruning of a decision-tree for the ear, nose, and throat realm in primary health care based on case-notes.

Authors:  T af Klercker
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.460

6.  Simulating an integrated critiquing system.

Authors:  M M Kuilboer; J van der Lei; J C de Jongste; S E Overbeek; B Ponsioen; J H van Bemmel
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Practice based, longitudinal, qualitative interview study of computerised evidence based guidelines in primary care.

Authors:  Nikki Rousseau; Elaine McColl; John Newton; Jeremy Grimshaw; Martin Eccles
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-02-08

8.  AsthmaCritic: issues in designing a noninquisitive critiquing system for daily practice.

Authors:  Manon M Kuilboer; Marc A M van Wijk; Mees Mosseveld; Johan van der Lei
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-06-04       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Towards computerizing intensive care sedation guidelines: design of a rule-based architecture for automated execution of clinical guidelines.

Authors:  Femke Ongenae; Femke De Backere; Kristof Steurbaut; Kirsten Colpaert; Wannes Kerckhove; Johan Decruyenaere; Filip De Turck
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 2.796

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.