Literature DB >> 7617349

Randomized comparison of general and regional anesthesia for cesarean delivery in pregnancies complicated by severe preeclampsia.

D H Wallace1, K J Leveno, F G Cunningham, A H Giesecke, V E Shearer, J E Sidawi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the maternal and fetal effects of three anesthetic methods used randomly in women with severe preeclampsia who required cesarean delivery.
METHODS: Eighty women with severe preeclampsia, who were to be delivered by cesarean, were randomized to general (26 women), epidural (27), or combined spinal-epidural (27) anesthesia. The mean preoperative blood pressure (BP) was approximately 170/110 mmHg, and all women had proteinuria. Anesthetic and obstetric management included antihypertensive drug therapy and limited intravenous (IV) fluid and drug therapy.
RESULTS: The mean gestational age at delivery was 34.8 weeks. All infants were born in good condition as assessed by Apgar scores and umbilical arterial blood gas determinations. Maternal hypotension resulting from regional anesthesia was managed without excessive IV fluid administration. Similarly, maternal BP was managed without severe hypertensive effects in women undergoing general anesthesia. There were no serious maternal or fetal complications attributable to any of the three anesthetic methods.
CONCLUSION: General as well as regional anesthetic methods are equally acceptable for cesarean delivery in pregnancies complicated by severe preeclampsia if steps are taken to ensure a careful approach to either method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7617349     DOI: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00139-i

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  13 in total

Review 1.  Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials.

Authors:  A Rodgers; N Walker; S Schug; A McKee; H Kehlet; A van Zundert; D Sage; M Futter; G Saville; T Clark; S MacMahon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-12-16

Review 2.  Fortnightly review: management of hypertension in pregnancy.

Authors:  L A Magee; M P Ornstein; P von Dadelszen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-05-15

3.  National cross sectional survey to determine whether the decision to delivery interval is critical in emergency caesarean section.

Authors:  Jane Thomas; Shantini Paranjothy; David James
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-03-15

Review 4.  [The new S1 guidelines "Obstetric analgesia and anesthesia"-Presentation and comments].

Authors:  Dorothee H Bremerich; Susanne Greve
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 5.  [Recent standards in management of obstetric anesthesia].

Authors:  Maximiliaan van Erp; Clemens Ortner; Stefan Jochberger; Klaus Ulrich Klein
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2017-07-25

Review 6.  [Anesthetic management of parturients with pre-eclampsia and eclampsia].

Authors:  N I Fetsch; D H Bremerich
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 7.  Neuraxial blockade for the prevention of postoperative mortality and major morbidity: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews.

Authors:  Joanne Guay; Peter Choi; Santhanam Suresh; Natalie Albert; Sandra Kopp; Nathan Leon Pace
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-01-25

Review 8.  Regional anaesthesia in pre-eclampsia: advantages and disadvantages.

Authors:  Nanda Gopal Mandal; Sridhar Surapaneni
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  A retrospective study of the outcome of cesarean section for women with severe pre-eclampsia in a third world setting.

Authors:  Obinna V Ajuzieogu; Humphrey Azubuike Ezike; Adaobi Obianuju Amucheazi; Jamike Enwereji
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2011-01

10.  Subarachnoid block for caesarean section in severe preeclampsia.

Authors:  Sujata Chaudhary; Rashmi Salhotra
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.